linux-sparse.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Derek M Jones <derek@knosof.co.uk>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@sw.ru>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, adobriyan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: declaration specifiers wooziness
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:44:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <468285D1.1020506@knosof.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4682836C.10201@knosof.co.uk>

All,

>>> The syntax permits:
>>>
>>> signed unsigned short long double int;
>>
>> Please, read 6.7.2(2).
> 
> Semantic spoil sport.

The point I did not mention before sending the email
was the extent to which Sparse needs to check constructs
that are constraint violations and thus assumed to be checked
by the compiler.

Ok, it is possible to get weird looking stuff through sparse
without complaint, but is it worth spending time flagging it?

Surely time should be concentrated on flagging suspicious constructs
that are valid C and not in correctly handling obscure corners
of the language.

-- 
Derek M. Jones                              tel: +44 (0) 1252 520 667
Knowledge Software Ltd                      mailto:derek@knosof.co.uk
Applications Standards Conformance Testing    http://www.knosof.co.uk

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-27 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-27 10:33 declaration specifiers wooziness Alexey Dobriyan
2007-06-27 15:01 ` Josh Triplett
2007-06-27 15:16   ` Derek M Jones
2007-06-27 15:31     ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-06-27 15:34       ` Derek M Jones
2007-06-27 15:44         ` Derek M Jones [this message]
2007-06-27 15:48           ` Josh Triplett
2007-06-27 16:00           ` Al Viro
2007-06-27 15:39     ` Al Viro
2007-06-27 15:39     ` Josh Triplett
2007-06-27 15:41       ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=468285D1.1020506@knosof.co.uk \
    --to=derek@knosof.co.uk \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@sw.ru \
    --cc=josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).