From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Triplett Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Bitfield without explicit sign should be a warning, not an error Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:09:51 -0700 Message-ID: <468350AF.2050704@freedesktop.org> References: <20070628053954.30704.66440.stgit@dv.roinet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFC90D229BFC50530B5117638" Return-path: Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.9]:55639 "EHLO mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752375AbXF1GJx (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2007 02:09:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070628053954.30704.66440.stgit@dv.roinet.com> Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Roskin Cc: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFC90D229BFC50530B5117638 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pavel Roskin wrote: > The -Wdefault-bitfield-sign is supposed to control a warning, just like= > other -W options. I've applied this patch; thanks! - Josh Triplett --------------enigFC90D229BFC50530B5117638 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGg1CvGJuZRtD+evsRAir4AJ45ceINlIUIZ4W0GSa0wmH0BGhiDwCfTvgh CutYCyO4gQzoQ2ZooBDfric= =uFiz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFC90D229BFC50530B5117638--