From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Santos Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] compiler-gcc{3,4}.h: Use GCC_VERSION macro Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 13:27:58 -0500 Message-ID: <5071C9AE.2010106@att.net> References: <1349465759-20524-1-git-send-email-daniel.santos@pobox.com> <1349466169-20637-3-git-send-email-daniel.santos@pobox.com> <20121006231041.GB3278@liondog.tnic> Reply-To: Daniel Santos Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121006231041.GB3278@liondog.tnic> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Borislav Petkov , LKML , Andi Kleen , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Christopher Li , David Daney , David Howells , David Rientjes , Joe Perches , Konstantin Khlebnikov , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Michel Lespinasse , Paul Gortmaker , Pavel Pisa , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Daniel Santos List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On 10/06/2012 06:10 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 02:42:42PM -0500, danielfsantos@att.net wrote= : >> Using GCC_VERSION reduces complexity, is easier to read and is GCC's >> recommended mechanism for doing version checks. (Just don't ask me w= hy >> they didn't define it in the first place.) This also makes it easy = to >> merge compiler-gcc{,3,4}.h should somebody want to. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos >> Acked-by: David Rientjes >> --- > > [ =E2=80=A6 ] > >> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h b/include/linux/compiler-= gcc4.h >> index 4506d65..bbfeb13 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h >> +++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h >> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ >> =20 >> /* GCC 4.1.[01] miscompiles __weak */ >> #ifdef __KERNEL__ >> -# if __GNUC_MINOR__ =3D=3D 1 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ <=3D 1 >> +# if GCC_VERSION >=3D 40100 && GCC_VERSION <=3D 40101 >> //# error Your version of gcc miscompiles the __weak directive > > Did I miss something again? This "error" preprocessor function is > commented out here? Why? We'll have to ask Andrew. Maybe so he can test on those versions of gc= c? commit d3ffe64a1dbcfe18b57f90f7c01c40c93d0a8b92 Author: Andrew Morton Date: Fri Sep 28 00:02:42 2012 +0000 a =20 Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc= 4.h index 934bc34..997fd8a 100644 --- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h +++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ /* GCC 4.1.[01] miscompiles __weak */ #ifdef __KERNEL__ # if __GNUC_MINOR__ =3D=3D 1 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ <=3D 1 -# error Your version of gcc miscompiles the __weak directive +//# error Your version of gcc miscompiles the __weak directive # endif #endif I can provide you a version of these patches rebased against Linus if you like, which I am using to test since the -mm & -next trees aren't working on my machine (hardware, .config and/or LVM/RAID setup). I haven't put Walken's patches underneath them however.