From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sparse and anonymous unions
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:51:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53391E67.2000306@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53242AC7.9080301@xs4all.nl>
On 03/15/2014 11:26 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to cut down the list of sparse warnings and errors I get when
> compiling drivers/media. Most of them are obviously our problem, but there
> is one that seems to be a sparse bug:
>
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dv-timings.c:30:9: error: unknown field name in initializer
>
> This uses the v4l2_dv_timings type which is defined here:
>
> include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
>
> and which has an anonymous union:
>
> struct v4l2_dv_timings {
> __u32 type;
> union {
> struct v4l2_bt_timings bt;
> __u32 reserved[32];
> };
> } __attribute__ ((packed));
>
> The macro used in the source above comes from this header:
>
> include/uapi/linux/v4l2-dv-timings.h
>
> and is defined as follows:
>
> #if __GNUC__ < 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && (__GNUC_MINOR__ < 6))
> /* Sadly gcc versions older than 4.6 have a bug in how they initialize
> anonymous unions where they require additional curly brackets.
> This violates the C1x standard. This workaround adds the curly brackets
> if needed. */
> #define V4L2_INIT_BT_TIMINGS(_width, args...) \
> { .bt = { _width , ## args } }
> #else
> #define V4L2_INIT_BT_TIMINGS(_width, args...) \
> .bt = { _width , ## args }
> #endif
>
> /* CEA-861-E timings (i.e. standard HDTV timings) */
>
> #define V4L2_DV_BT_CEA_640X480P59_94 { \
> .type = V4L2_DV_BT_656_1120, \
> V4L2_INIT_BT_TIMINGS(640, 480, 0, 0, \
> 25175000, 16, 96, 48, 10, 2, 33, 0, 0, 0, \
> V4L2_DV_BT_STD_DMT | V4L2_DV_BT_STD_CEA861, 0) \
> }
>
> The problem is that it seems that sparse follows the old pre-4.6 rules for
> initializing anonymous unions instead of what is actually in the C standard.
>
> If I add ' || defined(__CHECKER__)' to the #if above it will pass without
> generating sparse errors.
>
> Is this something that can be fixed in sparse, or am I forced to add the
> 'defined(__CHECKER__)' to the #if condition?
Here is a simple test case for this problem:
====== anon-union.c ======
struct s {
union {
int val;
};
};
static struct s foo = { .val = 5, };
/*
* check-name: duplicate extern array
*
* check-error-start
* check-error-end
*/
====== anon-union.c ======
Running sparse gives:
anon-union.c:7:26: error: unknown field name in initializer
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-31 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-15 10:26 sparse and anonymous unions Hans Verkuil
2014-03-31 7:51 ` Hans Verkuil [this message]
2014-03-31 8:05 ` Hans Verkuil
2014-03-31 17:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-03 19:15 ` Christopher Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53391E67.2000306@xs4all.nl \
--to=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).