* Unused arg_count field
@ 2008-09-06 16:01 David Given
2008-09-08 20:40 ` Christopher Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Given @ 2008-09-06 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sparse
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 318 bytes --]
I notice that struct symbol::arg_count doesn't appear to be used,
anywhere. Is this obsolete?
--
┌─── ｄｇ＠ｃｏｗｌａｒｋ．ｃｏｍ ───── http://www.cowlark.com ─────
│
│ "All power corrupts, but we need electricity." --- Diana Wynne Jones,
│ _Archer's Goon_
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Unused arg_count field
2008-09-06 16:01 Unused arg_count field David Given
@ 2008-09-08 20:40 ` Christopher Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Li @ 2008-09-08 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Given; +Cc: linux-sparse
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 9:01 AM, David Given <dg@cowlark.com> wrote:
> I notice that struct symbol::arg_count doesn't appear to be used,
> anywhere. Is this obsolete?
>
Indeed. This is not used.
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-09-08 20:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-09-06 16:01 Unused arg_count field David Given
2008-09-08 20:40 ` Christopher Li
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).