From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Li Subject: Re: [patches] more declarations fixes Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:27:26 -0700 Message-ID: <70318cbf0903101427y238844d9xfa19baa8c637437e@mail.gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.234]:37834 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754225AbZCJV11 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:27:27 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so2399481rvb.1 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:27:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro Cc: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Al Viro wrote: > > OK, that pile ought to take care of a lot of nastiness. =A0We still h= ave > rather messy crap in attributes' handling, but it's actually getting > cleaner now. =A0In particular, direct_declarator and declaration_spec= ifiers > are relatively sane, handling of type specifiers should be correct no= w (and > much cleaner than it used to be) and most of the tangled mess around > attributes is untangled. =A0Still a mess, but at least doing somethin= g > about it becomes feasible... > I really like these series of patches. All applied. It is much cleaner now. BTW, what does Set_S and Set_T means? Symbol and type? Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse"= in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html