From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Li Subject: Re: [PATCH] add warnings enum-to-int and int-to-enum Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 13:02:06 -0700 Message-ID: <70318cbf0909031302s255cc0a9ge7bdd2bc5b7f92b9@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090830153202.4dc5c58c@s6510> <200909031347.35371.kdudka@redhat.com> <70318cbf0909031138s4c066005vcd8b8f614723b05f@mail.gmail.com> <200909032054.01900.kdudka@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f195.google.com ([209.85.212.195]:56668 "EHLO mail-vw0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756135AbZICUCG (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2009 16:02:06 -0400 Received: by vws33 with SMTP id 33so236580vws.33 for ; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:02:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200909032054.01900.kdudka@redhat.com> Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Kamil Dudka Cc: Josh Triplett , Stephen Hemminger , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Morten Welinder On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > Two personalities are still not so many ... have you ever looked to the gcc > code? :-) That is why I don't want to start a trend. > I didn't say hard, but actually not useful from my point of view. If it's easy > for you to split my patch to the two pieces, you are welcome to have a go at > that. We can still wait for opinion of the original authors. Perhaps they can > bring some light to this problem. Fair enough .I need to spend more time to digest this patch. Chris