linux-sparse.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
	Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 13/21] evaluate: recognize members of static compound objects as address constants
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 03:40:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871t8xi251.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lh75jh9l.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolai Stange's message of "Mon, 01 Feb 2016 03:28:38 +0100")

According to 6.6(9), the member access operators "." and "->" may be used
in the creation of address constants.

Uses of both operators amount to the creation of EXPR_DEREF expressions
which are eventually fed into evaluate_offset() at evaluation.

Make evaluate_offset() propagate any address constant flag of the object
containing the referenced member to the newly created pointer addition
expression.

Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
---
 evaluate.c                                   |  6 ++++++
 validation/constexpr-addr-of-static-member.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 validation/constexpr-addr-of-static-member.c

diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
index 16b4ce0..f31ba9c 100644
--- a/evaluate.c
+++ b/evaluate.c
@@ -1957,6 +1957,12 @@ static struct expression *evaluate_offset(struct expression *expr, unsigned long
 	 * we ever take the address of this member dereference..
 	 */
 	add->ctype = &lazy_ptr_ctype;
+	/*
+	 * The resulting address of a member access through an address
+	 * constant is an address constant again [6.6(9)].
+	 */
+	add->constexpr_flags = expr->constexpr_flags;
+
 	return add;
 }
 
diff --git a/validation/constexpr-addr-of-static-member.c b/validation/constexpr-addr-of-static-member.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f944f21
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/constexpr-addr-of-static-member.c
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+struct A {
+	int a;
+	int b[2];
+};
+
+struct B {
+	int c;
+	struct A d;
+};
+
+static struct B a= {1, {1, {1, 1}}};
+
+static int *b = &a.d.a;	// OK
+static int *c = &(&a.d)->a;	// OK
+static int *d = a.d.b;		// OK
+static int *e = (&a.d)->b;	// OK
+static int *f = &a.d.b[1];	// OK
+static int *g = &(&a.d)->b[1];	// OK
+
+/*
+ * check-name: address of static object's member constness verification.
+ * check-command: sparse -Wconstexpr-not-const $file
+ *
+ * check-error-start
+ * check-error-end
+ */
-- 
2.7.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-01  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-01  2:28 [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling Nicolai Stange
2016-02-01  2:29 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 21:23   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:30 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] expression: init constexpr_flags at expression allocation Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 16:59   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:31 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] expression: examine constness of casts at evaluation only Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 20:43   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:32 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] expression: examine constness of binops and alike " Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:06   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] expression: examine constness of preops " Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:09   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:34 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] expression: examine constness of conditionals " Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:11   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:35 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] expression: add support for tagging arithmetic constant expressions Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:13   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:36 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] expression, evaluate: add support for tagging address constants Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:15   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:37 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:28   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:38 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] expression, evaluate: recognize static objects as address constants Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:38   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:39 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] evaluate: recognize address constants created through casts Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:44   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:39 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] evaluate: recognize address constants created through pointer arithmetic Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:46   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:40 ` Nicolai Stange [this message]
2016-03-15 17:46   ` [PATCH v3 13/21] evaluate: recognize members of static compound objects as address constants Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:41 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] evaluate: recognize string literals " Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:46   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:42 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] expression: recognize references to labels " Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:47   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:42 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] expression: examine constness of __builtin_offsetof at evaluation only Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 19:52   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:43 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] symbol: flag builtins constant_p, safe_p and warning as constexprs Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 19:45   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:44 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] evaluate: relax some constant expression rules for pointer expressions Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:47   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-03-15 19:44     ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-03-15 18:10   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:45 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] expression, evaluate: support compound literals as address constants Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 20:02   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:46 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] symbol: do not inherit storage modifiers from base types at examination Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 20:31   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01  2:47 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] evaluation: treat comparsions between types as integer constexpr Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 20:34   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-19  8:22 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling Nicolai Stange
2016-02-24  9:45   ` Christopher Li
2016-02-24 12:13     ` Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 16:54   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-03-15 22:36 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-10-28 20:28   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-11-23  3:12 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-23  4:05   ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-11-23  6:49     ` Christopher Li
2016-11-23  8:39       ` Nicolai Stange
2016-11-23 15:36         ` Christopher Li
2016-11-23 16:43           ` Nicolai Stange
2016-11-23 17:38             ` Christopher Li
2016-11-23 18:23               ` Christopher Li
2016-11-23 18:33               ` Nicolai Stange
2016-11-24  1:18                 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-24  9:45                   ` Nicolai Stange
2016-11-24 11:24                     ` Christopher Li
2016-11-24 17:22                       ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-12-06  6:00                     ` Christopher Li
2016-12-06 16:54                       ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-29 14:42                       ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31  5:06                         ` Christopher Li
2017-03-31  8:55                           ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 10:40                             ` Christopher Li
2017-03-31 19:47                               ` Luc Van Oostenryck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871t8xi251.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=nicstange@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).