From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolai Stange Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/13] improve constexpr handling Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:34:44 +0100 Message-ID: <874mf1r6u3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87y4i7kdlq.fsf@gmail.com> <20150723003757.GA28528@cloud> <871tfzi6cq.fsf@gmail.com> <20150723184723.GA1605@cloud> <878u9qci4o.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:36378 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752744AbbL2Ier (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Dec 2015 03:34:47 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f67.google.com with SMTP id l65so30988814wmf.3 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:34:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Christopher Li's message of "Sun, 9 Aug 2015 20:06:45 -0400") Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Christopher Li Cc: Nicolai Stange , Linux-Sparse , Al Viro , Josh Triplett Christopher Li writes: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote: >> Just a friendly ping to get some more reviews to consider in my next >> resend, especially on [13/13] and whether to relax the constant >> expression rules to treat pointer differences of address constants as >> (arithmetic or integer) constant expressions. > > Sorry for the late reply. I am working on it. It will take me a bit of time > to think about the change. I like the generate direction you are going. > > Chris Hi Chris, do you see any way to get this one going again? Cheers, Nicolai