linux-sparse.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
	linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [patch 5/9] x86: Cure per CPU madness on UP
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:21:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edc6i45s.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28ceb124-b634-44e0-bcd4-848fc3b0be7a@app.fastmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 18 2024 at 20:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> FWIW, I did some experiments a few weeks ago on 32-bit ARM,
> using a fairly minimal kernel in a virtual machine, and
> checking the runtime memory consumption rather than compile-time.
> In a kvm guest with 32MiB RAM, I saw a difference of multiple
> megabytes in memory usage:
>
> Linux testvm 6.8.0-rc4-00410-gc02197fc9076-dirty #1 SMP PREEMPT armv7l
> root@testvm:~# free
>            	total   used    free  	shared  buff/cache   available
> Mem:       	26932   14956   1732   	    52       12800   	11976
> Swap:      	16360    3632   12728
>
> Linux testvm 6.8.0-rc4-00410-gc02197fc9076-dirty #2 PREEMPT armv7l
> root@testvm:~# free
>            	total    used  	free  	shared  buff/cache   available
> Mem:       	26932   13744  	5648        32       10092   	13188
> Swap:      	16360    3880  	12480
>
> There is a little difference between runs, but this does seem
> significant enough to keep it. The SMP build was with
> CONFIG_NR_CPUS=2 (the smallest supported compile-time number),
> but running on a single-CPU qemu instance.

With a SMP=y, NR_CPUS=1 build on x86 64bit I get:

               total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
Mem:        32882056      498068    32590580        4884      128884    32383988
Swap:         998396           0      998396

Same config just SMP=n:

               total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
Mem:        32885804      461704    32635284        4876      119480    32424100
Swap:         998396           0      998396

So the delta for available is ~40 MiB.

But if I look at it with init=/bin/sh on the command line then the delta
is significantly different:

With a SMP=y, NR_CPUS=1 build on x86 64bit I get:

               total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
Mem:        32883680      324120    32822728         216       10864    32559560
Swap:              0           0           0

Same config just SMP=n:

               total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
Mem:        32885804      326876    32821972         216       11100    32558928
Swap:              0           0           0

Delta available = 632 KiB

I haven't had the time to stare at that in detail, but comparing
/proc/meminfo for the full boot case above does not immediately give me
a hint. It's confusing at best...

Thanks,

        tglx


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-19 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-04 10:12 [patch 0/9] x86: Cure tons of sparse warnings (mostly __percpu) Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 1/9] perf/x86/amd/uncore: Fix __percpu annotation Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 2/9] x86/msr: Prepare for including percpu.h Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 3/9] x86/msr: Add missing __percpu annotations Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 4/9] smp: Consolidate smp_prepare_boot_cpu() Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 5/9] x86: Cure per CPU madness on UP Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-15 16:17   ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-15 16:42     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-03-15 17:02       ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-15 17:40       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-15 22:55         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-15 23:23           ` Linus Torvalds
2024-03-16  1:11             ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-16  1:23               ` Linus Torvalds
2024-03-16 21:34                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-17 21:03               ` David Laight
2024-03-18 11:11               ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-18 17:27               ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-18 19:13                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-19 16:21                   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-03-19 18:26                     ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-16  0:56           ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-20  8:58     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-20 15:46       ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-21 11:14         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-21 14:06           ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-21 16:49             ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 6/9] x86/uaccess: Add missing __force to casts in __access_ok() and valid_user_address() Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 7/9] x86/cpu: Use EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL() for x86_spec_ctrl_current Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 8/9] x86/cpu: Provide a declaration for itlb_multihit_kvm_mitigation Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 10:12 ` [patch 9/9] x86/callthunks: Use EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL() for per CPU variables Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-04 11:08 ` [patch 0/9] x86: Cure tons of sparse warnings (mostly __percpu) Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87edc6i45s.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).