From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 10/21] expression, evaluate: recognize static objects as address constants
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 03:38:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87egcxi28v.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lh75jh9l.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolai Stange's message of "Mon, 01 Feb 2016 03:28:38 +0100")
Introduce support for recognizing address constants created either
- explicitly by referencing a static storage duration object by means
of the unary & operator,
- implicitly by the use of an expression of array or function type.
Initially tag an expression as being an address constant at the primary
expression level, i.e. upon encountering a symbol designating an object of
static storage duration in primary_expression().
Carry the address constant flag over to the *-preop wrapped expression
created by evaluate_symbol_expression().
When dereferencing such a *-preop wrapped expression, make
evaluate_addressof() keep any address constant flag for the unwrapped
expression.
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
---
evaluate.c | 3 ++-
expression.c | 8 ++++++++
validation/constexpr-addr-of-static.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 validation/constexpr-addr-of-static.c
diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
index 300bfbe..91f89f4 100644
--- a/evaluate.c
+++ b/evaluate.c
@@ -70,9 +70,11 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_symbol_expression(struct expression *expr)
addr->symbol = sym;
addr->symbol_name = expr->symbol_name;
addr->ctype = &lazy_ptr_ctype; /* Lazy evaluation: we need to do a proper job if somebody does &sym */
+ addr->constexpr_flags = expr->constexpr_flags;
expr->type = EXPR_PREOP;
expr->op = '*';
expr->unop = addr;
+ expr->constexpr_flags = CONSTEXPR_FLAG_NONE;
/* The type of a symbol is the symbol itself! */
expr->ctype = sym;
@@ -1682,7 +1684,6 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_addressof(struct expression *expr)
}
ctype = op->ctype;
*expr = *op->unop;
- expr->constexpr_flags = CONSTEXPR_FLAG_NONE;
if (expr->type == EXPR_SYMBOL) {
struct symbol *sym = expr->symbol;
diff --git a/expression.c b/expression.c
index b2d5eb4..11fb9cd 100644
--- a/expression.c
+++ b/expression.c
@@ -440,6 +440,14 @@ struct token *primary_expression(struct token *token, struct expression **tree)
}
expr->symbol_name = token->ident;
expr->symbol = sym;
+
+ /*
+ * A pointer to an lvalue designating a static storage
+ * duration object is an address constant [6.6(9)].
+ */
+ if(sym && (sym->ctype.modifiers & (MOD_TOPLEVEL | MOD_STATIC)))
+ expr->constexpr_flags = CONSTEXPR_FLAG_ADDR_CONST;
+
token = next;
break;
}
diff --git a/validation/constexpr-addr-of-static.c b/validation/constexpr-addr-of-static.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a3af99a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/constexpr-addr-of-static.c
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+static int a = 1;
+static int b[2] = {1, 1};
+static void c(void) {}
+
+static int *d = &a; // OK
+static int *e = d; // KO
+static int *f = b; // OK
+
+static void (*g)(void) = c; // OK
+static void (*h)(void) = &c; // OK
+
+static int *i = &*&a; // OK
+static int *j = &*b; // OK
+static int *k = &*d; // KO
+
+
+static void l(void) {
+ int a = 1;
+ static int *b = &a; // KO
+}
+
+static void m(void) {
+ static int a = 1;
+ static int *b = &a; // OK
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: address of static object constness verification.
+ * check-command: sparse -Wconstexpr-not-const $file
+ *
+ * check-error-start
+constexpr-addr-of-static.c:6:17: warning: non-constant initializer for static object
+constexpr-addr-of-static.c:14:19: warning: non-constant initializer for static object
+constexpr-addr-of-static.c:19:26: warning: non-constant initializer for static object
+ * check-error-end
+ */
--
2.7.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-01 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-01 2:28 [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling Nicolai Stange
2016-02-01 2:29 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 21:23 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:30 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] expression: init constexpr_flags at expression allocation Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 16:59 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:31 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] expression: examine constness of casts at evaluation only Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 20:43 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:32 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] expression: examine constness of binops and alike " Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:06 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] expression: examine constness of preops " Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:09 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:34 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] expression: examine constness of conditionals " Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:11 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] expression: add support for tagging arithmetic constant expressions Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:13 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:36 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] expression, evaluate: add support for tagging address constants Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:15 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:37 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:28 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:38 ` Nicolai Stange [this message]
2016-03-15 17:38 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] expression, evaluate: recognize static objects as address constants Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:39 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] evaluate: recognize address constants created through casts Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:44 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:39 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] evaluate: recognize address constants created through pointer arithmetic Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:46 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:40 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] evaluate: recognize members of static compound objects as address constants Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:46 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:41 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] evaluate: recognize string literals " Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:46 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:42 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] expression: recognize references to labels " Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:47 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:42 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] expression: examine constness of __builtin_offsetof at evaluation only Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 19:52 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:43 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] symbol: flag builtins constant_p, safe_p and warning as constexprs Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 19:45 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:44 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] evaluate: relax some constant expression rules for pointer expressions Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:47 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-03-15 19:44 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-03-15 18:10 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:45 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] expression, evaluate: support compound literals as address constants Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 20:02 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:46 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] symbol: do not inherit storage modifiers from base types at examination Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 20:31 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:47 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] evaluation: treat comparsions between types as integer constexpr Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 20:34 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-19 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling Nicolai Stange
2016-02-24 9:45 ` Christopher Li
2016-02-24 12:13 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 16:54 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-03-15 22:36 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-10-28 20:28 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-11-23 3:12 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-23 4:05 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-11-23 6:49 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-23 8:39 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-11-23 15:36 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-23 16:43 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-11-23 17:38 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-23 18:23 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-23 18:33 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-11-24 1:18 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-24 9:45 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-11-24 11:24 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-24 17:22 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-12-06 6:00 ` Christopher Li
2016-12-06 16:54 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-29 14:42 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 5:06 ` Christopher Li
2017-03-31 8:55 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 10:40 ` Christopher Li
2017-03-31 19:47 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87egcxi28v.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=nicstange@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).