From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 16/21] expression: examine constness of __builtin_offsetof at evaluation only
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 03:42:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oac1gngs.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lh75jh9l.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolai Stange's message of "Mon, 01 Feb 2016 03:28:38 +0100")
Currently, the determination of a __builtin_offsetof() expressions'
constness flags is done in two steps:
- Several flags are speculatively set at expression parsing time
- and possibly cleared again at evaluation if the member expression
includes a non-const array index like in
__builtin_offsetof(struct A, a.b[non_const_foo])
For consistency with other expression types' evaluation, defer the
determination of a __builtin_offsetof() expression's constness to
evaluation time, too.
Furthermore, carry an array index expression's constness flags
through the implicit cast to size_t type.
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
---
evaluate.c | 10 +++++++---
expression.c | 6 ------
validation/constexpr-offsetof.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 validation/constexpr-offsetof.c
diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
index 7a4af39..0101e61 100644
--- a/evaluate.c
+++ b/evaluate.c
@@ -3031,25 +3031,29 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_offsetof(struct expression *expr)
} else {
struct expression *idx = expr->index, *m;
struct symbol *i_type = evaluate_expression(idx);
+ unsigned old_idx_flags;
int i_class = classify_type(i_type, &i_type);
+
if (!is_int(i_class)) {
expression_error(expr, "non-integer index");
return NULL;
}
unrestrict(idx, i_class, &i_type);
+ old_idx_flags = idx->constexpr_flags;
idx = cast_to(idx, size_t_ctype);
+ idx->constexpr_flags = old_idx_flags;
m = alloc_const_expression(expr->pos,
bits_to_bytes(ctype->bit_size));
m->ctype = size_t_ctype;
- m->constexpr_flags |=
- CONSTEXPR_FLAG_INT_CONST_EXPR_SET_MASK;
+ m->constexpr_flags = CONSTEXPR_FLAG_INT_CONST_SET_MASK;
expr->type = EXPR_BINOP;
expr->left = idx;
expr->right = m;
expr->op = '*';
expr->ctype = size_t_ctype;
expr->constexpr_flags = m->constexpr_flags &
- idx->constexpr_flags;
+ idx->constexpr_flags &
+ ~CONSTEXPR_FLAG_DECAY_CONSTS_MASK;
}
}
if (e) {
diff --git a/expression.c b/expression.c
index ac6cf43..c3d54fe 100644
--- a/expression.c
+++ b/expression.c
@@ -200,8 +200,6 @@ static struct token *builtin_offsetof_expr(struct token *token,
return expect(token, ')', "at end of __builtin_offset");
case SPECIAL_DEREFERENCE:
e = alloc_expression(token->pos, EXPR_OFFSETOF);
- e->constexpr_flags =
- CONSTEXPR_FLAG_INT_CONST_EXPR_SET_MASK;
e->op = '[';
*p = e;
p = &e->down;
@@ -209,8 +207,6 @@ static struct token *builtin_offsetof_expr(struct token *token,
case '.':
token = token->next;
e = alloc_expression(token->pos, EXPR_OFFSETOF);
- e->constexpr_flags =
- CONSTEXPR_FLAG_INT_CONST_EXPR_SET_MASK;
e->op = '.';
if (token_type(token) != TOKEN_IDENT) {
sparse_error(token->pos, "Expected member name");
@@ -222,8 +218,6 @@ static struct token *builtin_offsetof_expr(struct token *token,
case '[':
token = token->next;
e = alloc_expression(token->pos, EXPR_OFFSETOF);
- e->constexpr_flags =
- CONSTEXPR_FLAG_INT_CONST_EXPR_SET_MASK;
e->op = '[';
token = parse_expression(token, &e->index);
token = expect(token, ']',
diff --git a/validation/constexpr-offsetof.c b/validation/constexpr-offsetof.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d1697b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/constexpr-offsetof.c
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+struct A {
+ int a[1];
+ int b;
+};
+
+extern int c;
+
+static int o[] = {
+ [__builtin_offsetof(struct A, b)] = 0, // OK
+ [__builtin_offsetof(struct A, a[0])] = 0, // OK
+ [__builtin_offsetof(struct A, a[0*0])] = 0, // OK
+ [__builtin_offsetof(struct A, a[c])] = 0 // KO
+};
+
+/*
+ * check-name: __builtin_offsetof() constness verification.
+ *
+ * check-error-start
+constexpr-offsetof.c:12:39: error: bad constant expression
+ * check-error-end
+ */
--
2.7.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-01 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-01 2:28 [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling Nicolai Stange
2016-02-01 2:29 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 21:23 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:30 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] expression: init constexpr_flags at expression allocation Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 16:59 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:31 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] expression: examine constness of casts at evaluation only Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 20:43 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:32 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] expression: examine constness of binops and alike " Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:06 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] expression: examine constness of preops " Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:09 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:34 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] expression: examine constness of conditionals " Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:11 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] expression: add support for tagging arithmetic constant expressions Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:13 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:36 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] expression, evaluate: add support for tagging address constants Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:15 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:37 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:28 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:38 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] expression, evaluate: recognize static objects as address constants Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:38 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:39 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] evaluate: recognize address constants created through casts Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:44 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:39 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] evaluate: recognize address constants created through pointer arithmetic Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:46 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:40 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] evaluate: recognize members of static compound objects as address constants Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:46 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:41 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] evaluate: recognize string literals " Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:46 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:42 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] expression: recognize references to labels " Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:47 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:42 ` Nicolai Stange [this message]
2016-03-15 19:52 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] expression: examine constness of __builtin_offsetof at evaluation only Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:43 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] symbol: flag builtins constant_p, safe_p and warning as constexprs Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 19:45 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:44 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] evaluate: relax some constant expression rules for pointer expressions Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 17:47 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-03-15 19:44 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-03-15 18:10 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:45 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] expression, evaluate: support compound literals as address constants Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 20:02 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:46 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] symbol: do not inherit storage modifiers from base types at examination Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 20:31 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 2:47 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] evaluation: treat comparsions between types as integer constexpr Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 20:34 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-19 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling Nicolai Stange
2016-02-24 9:45 ` Christopher Li
2016-02-24 12:13 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-03-15 16:54 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-03-15 22:36 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-10-28 20:28 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-11-23 3:12 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-23 4:05 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-11-23 6:49 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-23 8:39 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-11-23 15:36 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-23 16:43 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-11-23 17:38 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-23 18:23 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-23 18:33 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-11-24 1:18 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-24 9:45 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-11-24 11:24 ` Christopher Li
2016-11-24 17:22 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-12-06 6:00 ` Christopher Li
2016-12-06 16:54 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-29 14:42 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 5:06 ` Christopher Li
2017-03-31 8:55 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-03-31 10:40 ` Christopher Li
2017-03-31 19:47 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87oac1gngs.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=nicstange@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).