From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Schrober Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/5] FAQ: Remove outdated section about the license Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:19:25 +0100 Message-ID: <9559710.fHTLTMBSE0@bentobox> References: <1385633782-775-1-git-send-email-franzschrober@gmail.com> <1385633782-775-5-git-send-email-franzschrober@gmail.com> <20131128210538.GA15555@leaf> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from nm26-vm5.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com ([212.82.97.47]:32302 "HELO nm26-vm5.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752741Ab3K2MTh (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:19:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20131128210538.GA15555@leaf> Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Josh Triplett , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org Cc: jw+debian@jameswestby.net, sparse@chrisli.org On Thursday 28 November 2013 13:05:38 Josh Triplett wrote: > This previous section on "Why not GPL?" is now inaccurate as well; the > last paragraph no longer applies, given the MIT license. Yes, you are completely right. I've missed it because I've only searched for references to the OSL 1.1 -- Franz Schrober