Linux SPARSE checker discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Chris Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
Cc: soc@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
	"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	"Bill Wendling" <morbo@google.com>,
	"Justin Stitt" <justinstitt@google.com>,
	linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/13] include: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in non-uapi headers
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 08:33:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9aa270db-bfc6-4a33-a7f1-225782e9226e@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023064908.66707-13-thuth@redhat.com>

On 10/22/26 11:48 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> While the GCC and Clang compilers already define __ASSEMBLER__
> automatically when compiling assembly code, __ASSEMBLY__ is a
> macro that only gets defined by the Makefiles in the kernel.
> This can be very confusing when switching between userspace
> and kernelspace coding, or when dealing with uapi headers that
> rather should use __ASSEMBLER__ instead. So let's standardize now
> on the __ASSEMBLER__ macro that is provided by the compilers.
> 
> This is a completely mechanical patch (done with a simple "sed -i"
> statement).

For future patch submissions, please include the command that has been
used to modify the code in the patch description. Anyway:

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-23 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20261023064908.66707-1-thuth@redhat.com>
2026-10-23  6:48 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] include: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in non-uapi headers Thomas Huth
2026-10-23 15:33   ` Bart Van Assche [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9aa270db-bfc6-4a33-a7f1-225782e9226e@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=nsc@kernel.org \
    --cc=soc@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox