From: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>
To: corbet@lwn.net, mchehab+huawei@kernel.org, dlatypov@google.com,
davidgow@google.com
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org,
cocci@inria.fr, smatch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
dan.carpenter@oracle.com, julia.lawall@inria.fr
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: dev-tools: Add a section for static analysis tools
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 20:22:30 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b8233e89227617a2cb47d85c654603c6583323d.1648593132.git.marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1648593132.git.marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>
Complement the Kernel Testing Guide documentation page by adding a
section about static analysis tools.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
---
Change log:
- Brought generic tool characteristics to the intro paragraph
- Made explicit that these tools run at compile time
- Added a note of caution about false positives
- Updated Coccinelle info to make it sound better and be more skimmable
Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
index 65feb81edb14..b5e02dd3fd94 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
@@ -115,3 +115,34 @@ that none of these errors are occurring during the test.
Some of these tools integrate with KUnit or kselftest and will
automatically fail tests if an issue is detected.
+Static Analysis Tools
+=====================
+
+In addition to testing a running kernel, one can also analyze kernel source code
+directly (**at compile time**) using **static analysis** tools. The tools
+commonly used in the kernel allow one to inspect the whole source tree or just
+specific files within it. They make it easier to detect and fix problems during
+the development process.
+
+Sparse can help test the kernel by performing type-checking, lock checking,
+value range checking, in addition to reporting various errors and warnings while
+examining the code. See the Documentation/dev-tools/sparse.rst documentation
+page for details on how to use it.
+
+Smatch extends Sparse and provides additional checks for programming logic
+mistakes such as missing breaks in switch statements, unused return values on
+error checking, forgetting to set an error code in the return of an error path,
+etc. Smatch also has tests against more serious issues such as integer
+overflows, null pointer dereferences, and memory leaks. See the project page at
+http://smatch.sourceforge.net/.
+
+Coccinelle is another static analyzer at our disposal. Coccinelle is often used
+to aid refactoring and collateral evolution of source code, but it can also help
+to avoid certain bugs that occur in common code patterns. The types of tests
+available include API tests, tests for correct usage of kernel iterators, checks
+for the soundness of free operations, analysis of locking behavior, and further
+tests known to help keep consistent kernel usage. See the
+Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst documentation page for details.
+
+Beware, though, that static analysis tools suffer from **false positives**.
+Errors and warns need to be evaluated carefully before attempting to fix them.
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-29 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-29 23:21 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add a section for static analysis tools Marcelo Schmitt
2022-03-29 23:22 ` Marcelo Schmitt [this message]
2022-03-29 23:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: dev-tools: " Daniel Latypov
2022-03-30 2:33 ` David Gow
2022-03-30 8:04 ` Julia Lawall
2022-03-29 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: dev-tools: Enhance static analysis section with discussion Marcelo Schmitt
2022-03-30 2:48 ` David Gow
2022-03-30 8:07 ` Julia Lawall
2022-03-30 19:30 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2022-04-01 0:18 ` David Gow
2022-03-31 8:14 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-04-01 0:19 ` David Gow
2022-03-30 8:06 ` Julia Lawall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b8233e89227617a2cb47d85c654603c6583323d.1648593132.git.marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com \
--to=marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=smatch@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).