Re: [PATCH] parser: add Blackfin gcc info

[Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>]

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> I wonder, does it make sense to support these kinds of
>> architecture-specific builtins on all architectures, rather than
>> limiting them based on some specified target architecture?
>>
>> Since Sparse doesn't generate code, it can easily target all
>> architectures simultaneously, but that doesn't mean we couldn't tell it
>> what architecture to target.  Sparse could default to targeting the
>> host architecture, which would avoid the need to pass extra flags in the
>> common case.
>
> it does sound like it'd be useful to add an arch command line option.  but i
> hoped we could sneak in the Blackfin stuff first since other arches (like
> alpha) have been whitelisted.

Can we have some "ifdef" for the blackfin architecture in the pre buffer?
I agree with Josh, that do look like very much blackfin specific. We can leave
the ignore attribute alone for now.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html