linux-sparse.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk>
To: Linux-Sparse <linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RFC: Move Sparse development to github
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:58:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACXZuxfUbrV5P0aoTfOvfaX3RDW=Nc2-BPfXj1DLENznt_TE4Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

I would like to propose moving Sparse development to github. The model
I would like to propose is as follows:

1. Development should occur in the github hosted repository.
2. When a release is cut it can be merged into the current Sparse repository.
3. Bugs and enhancement proposals should be managed through github issues.
4. My suggestion would that for enhancements a simple majority voting
should be adopted to ensure that features go in because Sparse users
want them.
5. I would also suggest separating out the testing infrastructure to
another repository so that more people can help with testing. I would
be interested in helping with the testing infrastructure as I believe
this will ease a lot of the pain experienced today with making
changes.
6. I also would like to see a multiple committer model for development
so that someone like Luc who is making significant contributions has
commit access.
7. Releases ought to be time based - i.e. a release must be cut every
three months or six months - with the current feature set.

I think moving development to github and adopting a multi-committer
model will significantly improve things. Changes could be done faster,
and contributors will be more motivated by having ownership.

I think this might be a controversial topic - so apologies for raising
it but having observed the process for the past six months I do think
change is necessary.

Regards
Dibyendu

             reply	other threads:[~2017-08-10 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-10 10:58 Dibyendu Majumdar [this message]
2017-08-10 11:46 ` RFC: Move Sparse development to github Christopher Li
2017-08-11  0:11 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-08-12 14:04   ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2017-08-12 15:11     ` Luc Van Oostenryck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACXZuxfUbrV5P0aoTfOvfaX3RDW=Nc2-BPfXj1DLENznt_TE4Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=mobile@majumdar.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).