From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53B8C4363A for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:41:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A0722242 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:41:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603734118; bh=vpQ5tFPiLCFJV1Sry9KtCxLmgeGjA4r+OILADzUOOlg=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=bGF7Y/sBLZEcFl6s/C2HQUQP8ZLnPzAdM+cgNkhM63w9i0OpN4e6iKhUYXEWSfv3G kIqQ5kaKsy+MEcxVgROCJEe8aW4cDHjhPsD3WVk6Vy59JGoPs2F5tYeedgYVQUglI1 9CUBIqd2QekF/LGY37kf2XXPfjtv0Ggtc/iHKNdc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1788122AbgJZRl6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:41:58 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f193.google.com ([209.85.208.193]:40941 "EHLO mail-lj1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1788121AbgJZRl5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:41:57 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f193.google.com with SMTP id 23so11136749ljv.7 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:41:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=N6eZ8asGSWaNJRTlVJKaDhLMjE8/bJAq2MZ0ekD4X6g=; b=AeAFuRraeqZz5d8YOAA8DA1QfybZuP9XAHWSEO5ynfw42p7hacF+tiFh4GFxSb4IeT 3duNsU6RTOLUrLpBz2jL1dYm8U7yML6Fp1oORukvh1ifny8InAI5YqyWNZ+dzgWnsSgo 8e99Qh2Ap4qCRxKxbpcPBArRqXRItufUUZJaE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=N6eZ8asGSWaNJRTlVJKaDhLMjE8/bJAq2MZ0ekD4X6g=; b=qoFKdrx5PRBEVGpYBVt739KgDbssyVucP/Ln222ueHa5sxadIMCGsj1J1nMUUYVUob uAMQhDd8yqKRQI4dO7GjsNSA3+GCprk+nzqUmiD3+xVZ+uvIe8bJ3mwPVThlvzWIkcwc SoHTpM7LG/+tlRFLrbcEM6MVb3dADz0BxECihPP5G3v61uxxjeVQX7PupNpXdvMNp7jy vjaapMbyZ3diBtcRVsUgwuYJdoYRddpE2k9FPwyfT6AQEpUibfsVZzHAij1b8bRLO+q6 OYPPpwQYG2SyrB7f10BeGWMbYSV4+8mBGZXmgP6UOGXt46K04IK9QDrhGeF9KEuecXBt GPeg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530V13jk4w5Wb+zn+wV9gpp35TpvPGnkLAdobsVQu1JoH1XEOyzw B9EBv7gaJ6+qCTkDjUfo+HKl09TOzFtDZQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+K3JB7D99rVDcHLc7Mw0dkaQoDs49TSvk0WRTv7ncMj+4TgKNQkLILoOlyXzwizQvorzCDg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:87c6:: with SMTP id v6mr6785206ljj.233.1603734115012; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-f47.google.com (mail-lf1-f47.google.com. [209.85.167.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i139sm1100747lfi.276.2020.10.26.10.41.53 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id z2so13195430lfr.1 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:41:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a19:c703:: with SMTP id x3mr5104857lff.105.1603734113269; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:41:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201026045338.55218-1-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20201026045338.55218-1-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:41:36 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] handle more graciously labels with no statement To: Luc Van Oostenryck Cc: Sparse Mailing-list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 9:53 PM Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > > This occurs currently on v5.10-rc1 because of some ifdefery. Well, sparse being more robust is good, so the patch looks sane to me.. But can you point to the actual 5.10-rc1 problem? I haven't seen the report, and afaik gcc will complain about this too ("label at end of compound statement") so I'm surprised sparse hits it.. Linus