From: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
To: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk>
Cc: Linux-Sparse <linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Move Sparse development to github
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 07:46:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANeU7Q=dX9ZbnmsuSS19bJMdpieUtqdJzExTCbfKNHdnDqnzog@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACXZuxfUbrV5P0aoTfOvfaX3RDW=Nc2-BPfXj1DLENznt_TE4Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Dibyendu Majumdar
<mobile@majumdar.org.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose moving Sparse development to github. The model
> I would like to propose is as follows:
It does not need to be move from the release stand point of view.
I already have an github account and github repository of sparse.
I can merge the merge request from github (not using the github UI though).
The merge will reflect on github. That should satisfy most of your
points here.
A lot of time is spend on the discussion and figure out what is the
right thing to do. I still like the review before commit model. If Luc
want to make this is clear this is a git pull request I want this pull.
It be pull rather quickly using the current master model. A lot of time
I need to clarify weather the patch is for release or for view.
I can sync the master to github every time I push to korg. That part
is easy.
I am not a big fan of using the github UI for merge though. I can read the
github issue request there fine.
What you are really asking is having Luc on github has his own
sparse tree. Not just patches. I totally support of that too. I would be
happy to pull from his tree.
I still prefer the review and merge model for release though.
Thanks
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-10 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-10 10:58 RFC: Move Sparse development to github Dibyendu Majumdar
2017-08-10 11:46 ` Christopher Li [this message]
2017-08-11 0:11 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-08-12 14:04 ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2017-08-12 15:11 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANeU7Q=dX9ZbnmsuSS19bJMdpieUtqdJzExTCbfKNHdnDqnzog@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sparse@chrisli.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mobile@majumdar.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).