linux-sparse.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
To: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk>
Cc: Linux-Sparse <linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Move Sparse development to github
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 07:46:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANeU7Q=dX9ZbnmsuSS19bJMdpieUtqdJzExTCbfKNHdnDqnzog@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACXZuxfUbrV5P0aoTfOvfaX3RDW=Nc2-BPfXj1DLENznt_TE4Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Dibyendu Majumdar
<mobile@majumdar.org.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose moving Sparse development to github. The model
> I would like to propose is as follows:

It does not need to be move from the release stand point of view.
I already have an github account and github repository of sparse.

I can merge the merge request from github (not using the github UI though).
The merge will reflect on github. That should satisfy most of your
points here.

A lot of time is spend on the discussion and figure out what is the
right thing to do. I still like the review before commit model. If Luc
want to make this is clear this is a git pull request I want this pull.
It be pull rather quickly using the current master model. A lot of time
I need to clarify weather the patch is for release or for view.

I can sync the master to github every time I push to korg. That part
is easy.

I am not a big fan of using the github UI for merge though. I can read the
github issue request there fine.

What you are really asking is having Luc on github has his own
sparse tree. Not just patches.  I totally support of that too. I would be
happy to pull from his tree.

I still prefer the review and merge model for release though.

Thanks

Chris

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-10 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-10 10:58 RFC: Move Sparse development to github Dibyendu Majumdar
2017-08-10 11:46 ` Christopher Li [this message]
2017-08-11  0:11 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-08-12 14:04   ` Dibyendu Majumdar
2017-08-12 15:11     ` Luc Van Oostenryck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANeU7Q=dX9ZbnmsuSS19bJMdpieUtqdJzExTCbfKNHdnDqnzog@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=sparse@chrisli.org \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mobile@majumdar.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).