linux-sparse.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
To: Chris Forbes <chrisf@ijw.co.nz>
Cc: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] evaluate: warn on identical exprs around '&&'
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:24:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANeU7QkM+Umno8n5tpVBvrBit_RMphOqqkODKkoxM9SNUCRfUA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314484015-7694-1-git-send-email-chrisf@ijw.co.nz>

On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Chris Forbes <chrisf@ijw.co.nz> wrote:
> Adds a warning when identical expressions are found on both sides of the '&&' operator. This is a common error resulting from copy & paste.
>
> Excludes identical expressions found while preprocessing, so we don't get upset about #if defined(FOO) && defined(BAR), which happens all the time, and is perfectly valid.

I create a branch for the identical expression check.

http://git.kernel.org/?p=devel/sparse/chrisl/sparse.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/warn-equiv-expr

I did not plan to include it in this 0.4.4 release yet.
For now bug fix only.

I also want to see how it perform on project source code.
It is adding complexity and CPU run time to sparse, I like to see some
results.

> +static int ident_equal(struct ident *a, struct ident *b)
> +{
> +	/* only correct when used in the context of expr_equiv.
> +		should compare symbols? for general case? */
> +	return a->len == b->len &&
> +		!memcmp(a->name, b->name, a->len);
> +}

The ident_equal is overkill. The ident has been hashed and guarantee
unique.


You only need to compare pointer a == b. The whole point of
ident hashing is to reduce memcmp.

Chris

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-31  0:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-27 22:26 [PATCH 1/3] evaluate: warn on identical exprs around '&&' Chris Forbes
2011-08-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] evaluate: warn on identical exprs around '||' Chris Forbes
2011-08-27 22:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] evaluate: warn on identical exprs on ?: Chris Forbes
2011-08-28  2:46   ` Josh Triplett
2011-08-28  2:51     ` Chris Forbes
2011-08-28  2:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] evaluate: warn on identical exprs around '&&' Josh Triplett
2011-08-28  2:53   ` Chris Forbes
2011-08-28  3:33     ` Josh Triplett
2011-08-28  2:57   ` Chris Forbes
2011-08-28  3:36     ` Josh Triplett
2011-08-31  0:24 ` Christopher Li [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-28  3:14 Chris Forbes
2011-08-29 10:01 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2011-08-29 10:25   ` Josh Triplett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANeU7QkM+Umno8n5tpVBvrBit_RMphOqqkODKkoxM9SNUCRfUA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sparse@chrisli.org \
    --cc=chrisf@ijw.co.nz \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).