From: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
To: Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani@mykolab.com>
Cc: Sparse Mailing-list <linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Infinite loop with OOM while testing Sparse on Wine code
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:26:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANeU7Qkm_V8cYW3yKKBHo6PY9r0CA+XoTfJCVZbcOS14Am_PiA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANeU7Qk37weXva_-_M4bXeTTAT-DYGcccy+6jYv8pO6gzZNLcA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org> wrote:
> ======================
> test_menu_iteminfo:
> .L0:
> <entry-point>
> phisrc.32 %phi3(ansi) <- $1
> br .L1
>
> .L1:
> phi.32 %r1(ansi) <- %phi3(ansi), %phi4(ansi)
> cbr %r1(ansi), .L4, .L5
>
> .L4:
> cast.64 %r3 <- (64) stringA
> br .L5
>
> .L5:
> cbr %r1(ansi), .L6, .L2
>
> .L6:
> ptrcast.64 %r6 <- (64) %r3
> ptrcast.64 %r8 <- (64) VOID
> call.64 %r9 <- strcpy, %r6, %r8
> br .L2 <=============== L2 merge with L7
>
> .L2:
> seteq.32 %r11 <- %r1(ansi), $0
> phisrc.32 %phi4(ansi) <- %r11
> cbr %r1(ansi), .L1, .L3
>
> .L3:
> ret
> ======================
> test_menu_iteminfo:
> .L0:
> <entry-point>
> br .L4 <========= phisrc3 get optimize away. This seems wrong
I see more what is going on there now.
Basically we have %phi3 = 1, a constant.
There for when control flow go from L0->L1, %r1 = %phi3 = 1.
It will go to L4 for sure.
So L0 modify to goto L4 directly. That is fine.
>
> .L1:
> phi.32 %r1(ansi) <- VOID, %phi4(ansi) <======= this seems wrong.
> cbr %r1(ansi), .L4, .L5
phisrc3 has only one usage on L1. phisrc3 can be optimize away
and replace it with value 1. Showing VOID there is wrong.
it should be:
phi.32 %r1(ansi) <- 1, %phi4(ansi)
This phi instruction can't be deleted. Even though the control flow
has skip L1 and go to L4 directly. Makes L1 seems unreachable.
But the %r1(ansi) inside L1 is still used.
I think that is the nature of this bug.
Once sparse mistakenly remove %r1(ansi), it goes all crazy.
It result in the
"setne.32 %r11 <- %r11, $0 "
which does not make sense at all.
I have revert the change cause this problem on sparse-next.
Wine compile should be able to complete now.
Luc, do you have time to take a look at this? Without your input,
RC5 will be released with commit 11b1a83b disabled.
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-19 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-18 14:47 Infinite loop with OOM while testing Sparse on Wine code Michael Stefaniuc
2017-07-18 15:11 ` Christopher Li
2017-07-18 17:11 ` Christopher Li
2017-07-18 23:12 ` Christopher Li
2017-07-19 0:07 ` Christopher Li
2017-07-19 13:26 ` Christopher Li [this message]
2017-07-19 15:25 ` Christopher Li
2017-07-19 18:50 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2017-07-19 20:43 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-07-19 21:16 ` Christopher Li
2017-07-20 22:44 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-07-26 17:29 ` Christopher Li
2017-07-29 14:39 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-07-29 20:05 ` Christopher Li
2017-07-29 23:38 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-07-29 23:58 ` [PATCH] fix: try_to_simplify_bb eargerness part 2 Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-07-30 15:38 ` Christopher Li
2017-07-30 16:04 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-07-30 17:06 ` Christopher Li
2017-07-30 0:01 ` Infinite loop with OOM while testing Sparse on Wine code Luc Van Oostenryck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANeU7Qkm_V8cYW3yKKBHo6PY9r0CA+XoTfJCVZbcOS14Am_PiA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sparse@chrisli.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=mstefani@mykolab.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).