From: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-Sparse <linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Suggestion for fixing the variable length array used in the kernel.
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 20:46:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANeU7Qn-5b5U_64QzFt-beP-PyAJgzz=z1100F0v5WbWqZwZOQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I am looking at the current sparse warning on the kernel source.
One category of those warning are produce by the variable length array.
We all know that the kernel stack has a limit so we don't want to allocate
too much stack to the variable size array.
Is there a recommended way to fix those warnings? Is it worth while to
fix it at all? I am looking forward to some kind of guideline how to handle
this.
Some of them has estimated size limited, like the one fournd in decode_rs.c
/* Err+Eras Locator poly and syndrome poly The maximum value
* of nroots is 8. So the necessary stack size will be about
* 220 bytes max.
*/
uint16_t lambda[nroots + 1], syn[nroots];
uint16_t b[nroots + 1], t[nroots + 1], omega[nroots + 1];
uint16_t root[nroots], reg[nroots + 1], loc[nroots];
Some of them did not said the size estimation but you kind of know
they are not likely to blow up the stack:
In xen_flush_tlb_others
struct {
struct mmuext_op op;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
DECLARE_BITMAP(mask, num_processors);
#else
DECLARE_BITMAP(mask, NR_CPUS);
#endif
} *args;
And also some of them are harder to tell from the context if
there will be a size limit:
int snd_pcm_hw_refine(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params)
{
unsigned int k;
struct snd_pcm_hardware *hw;
struct snd_interval *i = NULL;
struct snd_mask *m = NULL;
struct snd_pcm_hw_constraints *constrs = &substream->runtime->hw_constraints;
unsigned int rstamps[constrs->rules_num]; <---------------------------------
Chris
next reply other threads:[~2013-03-07 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-07 4:46 Christopher Li [this message]
2013-03-09 0:29 ` Suggestion for fixing the variable length array used in the kernel Andrew Morton
2013-03-09 5:39 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-03-09 18:10 ` Christopher Li
2013-03-09 22:34 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-03-09 23:00 ` Christopher Li
2013-03-10 11:38 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANeU7Qn-5b5U_64QzFt-beP-PyAJgzz=z1100F0v5WbWqZwZOQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sparse@chrisli.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).