From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kamil Dudka <kdudka@redhat.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
Sparse Mailing-list <linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org>,
Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cse: update PHI users when throwing away an instruction
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:33:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLGWGL-zn-WxArEDRBKjB-DGmpztsugi176o3JiRC5fnXw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwPLDZZAEfP8xdFwqG2MG_79mbN_TjNTGRvyRq=WPWcSQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Kamil Dudka <kdudka@redhat.com> wrote:
>> The attached patch solves the dangling PHI nodes and does not seem to break
>> anything at first glance. It is probably not the most efficient solution,
>> but it might at least show where to look for the problem.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Hmm. From a quick look, looks fine to me. And checks the kernel, and
> does indeed get rid of the extraneous phi nodes in the test-case.
>
> Ack.
I applied both patches to sparse-llvm.git. Jeff, do they cure all loop
related issues?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-28 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-27 6:29 linearize bug? Jeff Garzik
2011-08-27 11:34 ` Kamil Dudka
2011-08-27 15:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-27 15:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-08-27 15:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-27 16:54 ` Kamil Dudka
2011-08-27 17:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-27 17:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-27 19:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-27 20:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-08-28 6:26 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-27 23:39 ` [PATCH] cse: update PHI users when throwing away an instruction Kamil Dudka
2011-08-28 0:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-28 6:32 ` Christopher Li
2011-08-28 6:33 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2011-08-28 8:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-08-27 22:07 ` linearize bug? Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOJsxLGWGL-zn-WxArEDRBKjB-DGmpztsugi176o3JiRC5fnXw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=kdudka@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).