* [PATCH 9/18] Fix handling of typedefs with several declarators
@ 2009-03-09 7:11 Al Viro
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2009-03-09 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sparse
We set MOD_USERTYPE only on the first one, so declaration_specifiers
didn't recognize something like
unsigned P;
where P had been such a typedef as redefinition (see the testcase).
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
parse.c | 3 +++
validation/multi_typedef.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 validation/multi_typedef.c
diff --git a/parse.c b/parse.c
index 7b1cfb6..1435fde 100644
--- a/parse.c
+++ b/parse.c
@@ -2365,6 +2365,9 @@ struct token *external_declaration(struct token *token, struct symbol_list **lis
return token;
}
+ if (is_typedef)
+ decl->ctype.modifiers |= MOD_USERTYPE;
+
bind_symbol(decl, ident, is_typedef ? NS_TYPEDEF: NS_SYMBOL);
/* Function declarations are automatically extern unless specifically static */
diff --git a/validation/multi_typedef.c b/validation/multi_typedef.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d9ffd0f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/multi_typedef.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+typedef int T, *P;
+static void f(void)
+{
+ unsigned P = 0;
+ unsigned x = P;
+}
+static void g(void)
+{
+ int P = 0;
+ int x = P;
+}
+/*
+ * check-name: typedefs with many declarators
+ * check-description: we didn't recognize P above as a typedef
+ */
--
1.5.6.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-03-09 7:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-09 7:11 [PATCH 9/18] Fix handling of typedefs with several declarators Al Viro
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).