From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Damien Lespiau" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Beautify all & install Makefile targets Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 20:28:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <11796983862564-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@gmail.com> <4650E944.1060506@freedesktop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.231]:54064 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757419AbXEVS2M (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 14:28:12 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h29so317465wxd for ; Tue, 22 May 2007 11:28:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4650E944.1060506@freedesktop.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Josh Triplett Cc: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org > I'd also like to hear from other people on whether or not they prefer this > style of output. It doesn't matter much to me either way. That won't prevent me from resending a more decent patch :p > > + QUIET_LD = @echo ' ' LD' '$@; > > This always seems misleading to me, given that the corresponding rules run CC, > not LD. Well, calling the linker through gcc front-end does not change the fact that we are linking. To me CC or LD are just saying we are compiling or linking. I'll resend a patch, trying to take care of your comments. -- Damien