Re: Handling of -specs in cgcc

["Alexey Zaytsev" <alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Morten Welinder <mwelinder@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Alexey Zaytsev
> <alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [Added the new address to the CC]
>
> ("troll.com" is a bitkeeper bug.  Use a machine named "troll" and
> bitkeeper would
> happily add ".com".)
>
> With respect to the substance, I am not sure why you want to remove -specs.
> It was never meant to take a filename -- it takes a token like "i86" and adds
> options for that.  That is not generally very useful, but has its uses
> for cross-
> compilation.

But won't gcc fail in such case? Maybe we should not remove, but replace it
with a unique option to specify for which architecture sparse should check?

>
> Morten
>