From: "Alexey Zaytsev" <alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com>
To: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@kernel.org>,
Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, David Given <dg@cowlark.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] Add type information to struct instruction.
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:46:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f19298770812222046l305f1a30ne8fa554d8cb8772e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70318cbf0812221921q5e53a8edhad06369537dc3a6c@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 06:21, Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org> wrote:
> I think this patch can have more discussion.
>
> If possible, I would rather no increase the instruction struct size.
> It is a very common structure, which responsible for a large part
> of the byte code memory usage. There is only one person
> (David) can benefit from it so far.
>
> I think what David need is just distinction of int vs pointer.
> We can do that by save an array of the known basic types.
> Including the abstract pointer type. Then we just use an
> index to the array rather than use the raw size directly.
>
Are you sre this is worth the effort (and code complication)? Struct
instruction is not exactly a tiny one, and a pointer would bloat it
by about 10%. On the other hand, I don't really unerstand why
the type information is associated with the instructions, and not
with the pseudos. Am I missing something?
> That have the extra benefit of, different architecture can share
> the same byte code.
Didn't understand this comment.
> Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-23 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-15 0:25 [PATCH 00/15] Trivial sparse patches Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-15 0:25 ` [PATCH 01/15] Evaluate iterator symbols Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-15 0:26 ` [PATCH 02/15] Unhardcode byte size being 8 bits Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-15 0:26 ` [PATCH 03/15] Add type information to struct instruction Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-23 3:21 ` Christopher Li
2008-12-23 4:46 ` Alexey Zaytsev [this message]
2008-12-23 5:38 ` Christopher Li
2008-12-23 11:23 ` David Given
2008-12-24 3:09 ` Christopher Li
2008-12-24 23:01 ` David Given
2008-12-24 23:27 ` Christopher Li
2008-12-24 4:53 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-15 0:26 ` [PATCH 04/15] Replace the -specs cgcc option with -target Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-15 0:26 ` [PATCH 05/15] Remove pre_buffer Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-15 0:26 ` [PATCH 06/15] Sparc64 (Sparc V9, LP64) support Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-15 0:26 ` [PATCH 07/15] OpenBSD support Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-15 0:26 ` [PATCH 08/15] Make show_symbol newline-consistent Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-15 0:27 ` [PATCH 09/15] Handle a terminal -o option properly Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-15 0:27 ` [PATCH 10/15] Looks more evident this way Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-15 0:27 ` [PATCH 11/15] Mark handle_switch as static and don't export it from lib.h Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-15 0:27 ` [PATCH 12/15] Handle missing argument to -D Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-15 0:27 ` [PATCH 13/15] Gdb macros to get a better look at some sparse data structures Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-15 0:27 ` [PATCH 14/15] A slightly edited irc discussion with Josh Triplett Alexey Zaytsev
2008-12-15 0:27 ` [PATCH 15/15] Warning should be enough for an unhandled transparent union Alexey Zaytsev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f19298770812222046l305f1a30ne8fa554d8cb8772e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=dg@cowlark.com \
--cc=josh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).