From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25858C76195 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com (mail-wr1-f65.google.com [209.85.221.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA0742080A for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="WVAJvThD" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BA0742080A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id p17so16567815wrf.11 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 04:02:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=hukSDBvejCeRA/4yqIF2pUsY8MeiMorK9iH41/yECWE=; b=WVAJvThDlrUR1PjmbcoQBsJgIoTLsiFGlMMJBhFmzAqQ4fz7gq23nw8IsmAL4OLRvB rGZ33j+7jr/gAXiShpPdenl2kOWKzf4bkQVOYcvLLsaRD5+kONM6zp4VekvriKYw4mh0 GJYv9/nOo4Nf5LyGib1GZQRqbpMfjwJLdBPG6oLSU1pJkNAgnt+6PvGpm9oj21LUUM3x z3SvHGe4lccKkwNUuioSOITAFgwRG4un6LY04ufhxs/0muhucWhucj3ojNMEVpCxH3lY 8pQmmjbmAABsnw4BFSSf7uS83iy0IF71yahblNeP3ZGpnpduf4zjrGmv1KUyAkkFyCQj Uu1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=hukSDBvejCeRA/4yqIF2pUsY8MeiMorK9iH41/yECWE=; b=OzBA5zKFBVLBLPBH1Gg2XIfxggnMhJTCQWjwXnEhzI0pT0CgeiGbZ47muAvzKbSlQS rpqogBv8xc0Tdf7V69tbvjeKFYVFUrtO4kDS+I4F3xvm/XHUi8+3S5gT/jyXDRUp67Lr ElUbecv/PxB3QOLv4MSD1P3CGXMx1KB/vEutWRuDIxo5XDh9HDSPCnqOma42hjE+OzFO Zx/7MBTSiHMpOWN+tNfbbFCgG47cZ/CGtm6GmzwvI+n2mZJ5SIJtTfHhSnhT1ZBk+abr st7fvcHd8cqO6qtuPHclaxQtWP6xWW4UdnB/bhdGGe+LJkB06FtqHyLoKsb4W30GFz6Z STEA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVJ026Tcp6CXdIr2hLOaEiRDg3DhSVpmTSJLm/Sblg78qbI5XPP FNltP2cRlvDvukYOFau1sW8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyDpmRiJ4rUoNj4baDQxpZ5k4SeUDsKZbZ5q6B2B2SNT0sa1BsSAQXMsvyv0I1v3koYaRYD6Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:52c5:: with SMTP id r5mr9964536wrv.146.1563188550205; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 04:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arch-x1c3 ([2a00:5f00:102:0:9665:9cff:feee:aa4d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y18sm16255024wmi.23.2019.07.15.04.02.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 04:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 12:02:28 +0100 From: Emil Velikov To: Qian Cai Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net, airlied@linux.ie, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, rfontana@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, joe@perches.com, linux-spdx@archiver.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, sean@poorly.run Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gpu/drm_memory: fix a few warnings Message-ID: <20190715110228.GD20839@arch-x1c3> References: <1562685190-1353-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw> <1562960735.8510.30.camel@lca.pw> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1562960735.8510.30.camel@lca.pw> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) List-Id: Hi Qian, On 2019/07/12, Qian Cai wrote: > Maybe one of the non-DRM maintainers (Andrew, Thomas or Greg) who cares a bit > about SPDX can pick this up. It occurs to me none of DRM maintainers cares about > this as there is no feedback from any of them for months since v1. > AFAICT there are a couple of reasons why this has gone unnoticed: - summary is the pretty ambiguous - commit does two thigs Another thing to consider is that this patch touches a single file, while the exact same issue is also present in many other files. Quick look at the following lists: head -n2 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_*[ch] | less drm_agpsupport.c drm_dma.c drm_legacy_misc.c drm_lock.c drm_memory.c drm_scatter.c drm_vm.c If you can fixup the s|/**|/*| in the above, I'd gladly merge the patch. On the topic of SPDX - no objection on my end, but it should be a separate patch, which replaces the explicit verbose license text with the tag. Thanks Emil