From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79974C433E2 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A7B2076D for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:44:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598834653; bh=6LFPsle47n36rc0FcyNKsEGD+oQ4SDQDYywUFSKldSk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=RGnZBOaIXw6ruHVmrxHUToGCpYXEV80gIuruNtpmRHqMwgI8RV+U8BFa76OOnNvA3 WS3YIeorVRQFOPLeSCyTS99zmboTB+k9uXLgMvjGpepwMKyMC6GDxkfmi2nzPrUKn6 KMqkdKrPdufX1RRhkEIDWiKgiF21aorxqs7Rl7rI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726388AbgHaAoM (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Aug 2020 20:44:12 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51232 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726179AbgHaAoL (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Aug 2020 20:44:11 -0400 Received: from X1 (unknown [65.49.58.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F10C9207BB; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:44:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598834651; bh=6LFPsle47n36rc0FcyNKsEGD+oQ4SDQDYywUFSKldSk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FqO+brb/S1ZYZR+ybuH+M8gh/BEZ8/GsluEaod9qSVDzwNgYPGNyU7DDH2mFQJtGk 1rt59pZPUr/dPHYYhq9IJH9JCvqG/i49ZHYaUV8gikAXPEDtE0GC2ilTIEc2ySqG8J bmXa2J5CykCnsfwLD9XSikkCFf2IWpjf+0P9Yy9s= Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 17:44:09 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Mrinal Pandey Cc: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, keescook@chromium.org, re.emese@gmail.com, maennich@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: Add intended executable mode and SPDX license Message-Id: <20200830174409.c24c3f67addcce0cea9a9d4c@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20200827092405.b6hymjxufn2nvgml@mrinalpandey> References: <20200827092405.b6hymjxufn2nvgml@mrinalpandey> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-spdx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:54:05 +0530 Mrinal Pandey wrote: > commit b72231eb7084 ("scripts: add spdxcheck.py self test") added the file > spdxcheck-test.sh to the repository without the executable flag and license > information. The x bit shouldn't matter. If someone downloads and applies patch-5.9.xz (which is a supported way of obtaining a kernel) then patch(1) will erase the x bit anyway. Is some other script invoking spdxcheck-test.sh directly, instead of using `/bin/sh spdxcheck-test.sh'? If so, please let's fix that.