Re: SPDX tag and top of file comment cleanups for the loop driver

Theodore Ts'o
2022-05-03T20:06:43Z

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 08:32:59AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Jens, hi Ted,
>
> the loop driver still had no SPDX tag, so this series cleans up some
> lose ends and fixes that up.
>
> Ted, does the SPDX tag match your original licensing decision back then,
> or do we need to correct it? Does the auto-converted tag on the loop.h
> SPDX header (GPL1.0 or later with syscall exception) make sense, or
> should that have been GPL2 only with syscall exception?

I think you've removed the loop.h in the patch series, so it shouldn't
matter what the tag would be for loop.h, right? In any case, GPLv2
only was certainly the intent at the time.

Cheers,

- Ted