From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06BFAE7D24C for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229556AbjIZICm (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2023 04:02:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50482 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229776AbjIZICl (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2023 04:02:41 -0400 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A202EC9; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 01:02:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BD53C433C7; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:02:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1695715355; bh=+bdOGKgX54Uph/y5/+UiUHfOhsH5oazHJwtFtKfreBk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eEtwNwPAE/qP9Yn/czy6CEhsKCMF3toxuKY9zJ14T+fvcV/b1halOX6FwehXakJR2 Ea70FiLdFRufd0J5lfEHq0uiITmg7v+NZdg9RWliwFcboSCOinAatGdxcnU4JcA6rR a+7hU/c1lgGHqFUshSYBR5ndDTTDB62C6/towlNM= Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:02:30 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Prarit Bhargava , Dave Miller , Vitaly Kuznetsov , jschlst@samba.org, linux-kernel , linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SPDX: Appletalk FW license in the kernel Message-ID: <2023092606-fiction-finlike-97a5@gregkh> References: <6100798b-ab1d-262a-fd5b-435d6dfc4a53@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 12:34:03AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 09:39:05AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > > To be clear, I am not asking for their removal, however, I do think a better > > license should be issued for these files. The files were trivially modified > > in 2006. It could be that the code in question is now unused and it is just > > easier to remove them. > > > > Is there anyone you know of that we could approach to determine a proper > > SPDX License for these files? > > The code contains firmware that is downloaded to the device. The proper > thing would be to convert them to separate binary files in the > linux-firmware packages. But given that the driver has seen nothing > but tree wide cleanups since the dawn of git I suspect there is no > maintainer and probably no user left. The best might be to indeed just > remove it and see if anyone screams, in which case we could bring it > back after doing the above. > We should just remove them for now, I have no objection to that at all. Want me to send the patch? thanks, greg k-h