From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11D1C43334 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 17:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229476AbiFFRM4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2022 13:12:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53566 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229720AbiFFRMo (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2022 13:12:44 -0400 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.188.207]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C36275EB; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 10:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 19:01:11 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Greg KH Cc: Thomas Gleixner , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org, Manoj Basapathi , Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan Subject: Re: netfilter: xtables: Bring SPDX identifier back Message-ID: References: <87ee016cji.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 06:56:12PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 05:34:34PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 05:23:45PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > Commit e2be04c7f995 ("License cleanup: add SPDX license identifier to > > > uapi header files with a license") added the correct SPDX identifier to > > > include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_IDLETIMER.h. > > > > > > A subsequent commit removed it for no reason and reintroduced the UAPI > > > license incorrectness as the file is now missing the UAPI exception > > > again. > > > > > > Add it back and remove the GPLv2 boilerplate while at it. > > > > LGTM. > > > > You handle this or I place this in the nf.git tree? > > If you want to take it, that's fine with me, otherwise I can in a > spdx-specific tree that I manage. I did not know there is a specific tree for this. > Your choice, which ever is easier for you. please take it