From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] remove spi-s3c24xx-gpio driver Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:45:25 +0900 Message-ID: <009e01cc3ad6$c14049d0$43c0dd70$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1309265357-15879-1-git-send-email-jacmet@sunsite.dk> <20110628212443.GI21138@trinity.fluff.org> <87ipro4loa.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <87ei2c4jch.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20110704165134.GF28042@ponder.secretlab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, 'Ben Dooks' , ben-linux@fluff.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: 'Grant Likely' , 'Peter Korsgaard' Return-path: In-reply-to: <20110704165134.GF28042@ponder.secretlab.ca> Content-language: ko List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org Grant Likely wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 07:51:10PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > > >>>>> "Grant" == Grant Likely writes: > > > > >> Great, will you handle the series or should it go through the spi tree? > > > > Grant> With the big spi driver rename, it should probably either go via the > > Grant> spi tree, or be put into a topic branch that can be merged by both the > > Grant> spi and samsung trees. > > > > Both is fine by me. Let me know if you want me to do something. > > It's pretty minimal arch/arm impact, and it depends on the big rename > patch, so why don't I just merge it directly into spi/next without a > topic branch. Hi Grant, I agree with you, it is not expected this makes some conflicts between spi and samsung tree. I think Ben's ack is enough on this, if required, Acked-by: Kukjin Kim Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.