RE: [PATCH 2/2] SPI: SAMSUNG: Bug fix for SPI with different FIFO level

[Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>]

Grant Likely wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:22:08PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > >
> > > Grant Likely wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 07:08:55PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > > > Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Grant, Jassi and all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will apply these 1 and 2 in my -fix tree for 3.0 with your
acks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > Oops, this needs previous 'cleanup spi platform specific code' so
> > can't
> > > > > apply -fix tree now.
> > > >
> > > > There may also be conflicts with the heavy rework in the spi tree.
> > > > Kgene, when you pick up this series, can you put it into a separate
> > > > topic branch and merge that into your main tree?  That way if there
> > > > are difficult conflicts, then I can also merge that same topic
branch
> > > > into spi/next to resolve them.
> > > >
> > > Hi Grant,
> > >
> > > Sure, no problem. I'm waiting for Padmavathi's new patch which is
based on
> > old
> > > code not new SPI code. When I merge topic branch for this into my
tree,
> > let you
> > > know immediately. Then if any problems, let's talk again :)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I made topic branch for this based on 3.0-rc6.
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
> > #for-spi
> 
> Okay.  If there are problems, then I'll merge it.  Thanks.
> 

Maybe 'If there are not problems'?

Anyway, where do you want to merge this -next or -fix? I think, this is
required for 3.0.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.