From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH V2] spi: Enable SPI driver for S5P6440 and S5P6450 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:19:58 +0900 Message-ID: <018b01cbb220$c00b3a50$4021aef0$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1294809658-13974-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, 'Sangbeom Kim' , dbrownell@users.courceforge.net, ben-linux@fluff.org, 'Abhilash Kesavan' To: 'Jassi Brar' Return-path: In-reply-to: Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org Jassi Brar wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > From: Abhilash Kesavan > > > > This patch enables the existing S3C64XX series SPI driver for S5P64X0 > > and removed dependency on EXPERIMENTAL because we don't need it now. > > > > Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan > > Signed-off-by: Sangbeom Kim > > Cc: Jassi Brar > > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim > > --- > > Changes since v1: > > - Removed dependency on EXPERIMENTAL > > > > Hi David and Grant, > > > > I missed that send to you when I have got this via Linux Samsung SoC > mailing list. > > Hmm...I know, it's 38 merge winodw...so I'm not sure can be handled now. > > > > Anyway if any problems, please let me know. > > > > Thanks and Happy New year :) > > > > Best regards, > > Kgene. > > > > drivers/spi/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/Kconfig b/drivers/spi/Kconfig > > index 1906840..37aec5e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/spi/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/spi/Kconfig > > @@ -310,8 +310,8 @@ config SPI_S3C24XX_GPIO > > > > config SPI_S3C64XX > > tristate "Samsung S3C64XX series type SPI" > > - depends on ARCH_S3C64XX && EXPERIMENTAL > > - select S3C64XX_DMA > > + depends on (ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5P64X0) > > + select S3C64XX_DMA if !ARCH_S5P64X0 > > help > > SPI driver for Samsung S3C64XX and newer SoCs. > > Since SoCs newer than S3C64xx use different DMAC, it would be > more efficient to do > select S3C64XX_DMA if ARCH_S3C64XX > otherwise we would have to add lots of !ARCH_S5Pxxx as more SoCs > are enabled. Yes, you're right. Will fix it soon. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.