From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Mark Brown' <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: 'Eddie James' <eajames@linux.ibm.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] spi: fsi: Reduce max transfer size to 8 bytes
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:32:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <018ee235eabd420bb32f6acf57dfe121@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210720131303.GB5042@sirena.org.uk>
From: Mark Brown
> Sent: 20 July 2021 14:13
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 01:04:38PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
>
> > Having said that, you might want a loop in the driver so that
> > application requests for longer transfers are implemented
> > with multiple hardware requests.
>
> No, that's something that should be and indeed is done in the core -
> this isn't the only hardware out there with some kind of restriction on
> length.
Ah, ok, there is another loop before any 'users'.
> > I do also wonder why there is support in the main kernel sources
> > for hardware that doesn't actually exist.
>
> We encourage vendors to get support for their devices upstream prior to
> hardware availability so that users are able to run upstream when they
> get access to hardware, this means users aren't forced to run out of
> tree code needlessly and greatly eases deployment.
This one just seemed a bit premature.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-20 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-16 13:39 [PATCH 0/2] spi: fsi: Reduce max transfer size to 8 bytes Eddie James
2021-07-16 13:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Eddie James
2021-07-16 17:19 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-16 18:34 ` Eddie James
2021-07-19 15:20 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-19 15:46 ` Eddie James
2021-07-20 13:04 ` David Laight
2021-07-20 13:13 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-20 17:32 ` David Laight [this message]
2021-07-16 13:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: fsi: Remove ibm,fsi2spi-restricted compatible Eddie James
2021-07-19 15:54 ` Mark Brown
2021-07-17 13:46 ` [PATCH 0/2] spi: fsi: Reduce max transfer size to 8 bytes David Laight
2021-07-19 15:57 ` Eddie James
2021-07-19 18:00 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=018ee235eabd420bb32f6acf57dfe121@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eajames@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).