From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely
<grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>,
spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Cc: kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC] spi/gpio: start with CS non-active
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 22:21:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1328822505-7039-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> (raw)
The chip select line was configured as output with the initial value
being active explicitly. It was later deasserted during
spi_bitbang_setup() without any clock activity in between. So it makes
no sense to activate the device at all and the chip select line can
better start non-active.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
Hello,
I'm not sure if an active chip select line without any clock activity can
confuse a device. If so, this patch might qualify as fix. But with my
limited knowledge about spi it's also possible that I just miss why the
active chip select is important. For the devices I have it doesn't seem
to make a difference.
Best regards
Uwe
drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c b/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c
index 0094c64..0b56cfc 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c
@@ -235,7 +235,8 @@ static int spi_gpio_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
status = gpio_request(cs, dev_name(&spi->dev));
if (status)
return status;
- status = gpio_direction_output(cs, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH);
+ status = gpio_direction_output(cs,
+ !(spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH));
}
}
if (!status)
--
1.7.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
spi-devel-general mailing list
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
next reply other threads:[~2012-02-09 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-09 21:21 Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
[not found] ` <1328822505-7039-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-05 7:45 ` [PATCH RFC] spi/gpio: start with CS non-active Uwe Kleine-König
[not found] ` <20120705074540.GF5398-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-09 12:08 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20120709120806.GB28306-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-09 20:18 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1328822505-7039-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig-bicnvbalz9megne8c9+irq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).