* [PATCH v3] spi/pl022: add devicetree support
@ 2012-06-26 14:05 Alexandre Pereira da Silva
2012-07-01 8:39 ` Thierry Reding
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Pereira da Silva @ 2012-06-26 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roland Stigge
Cc: Alexandre Pereira da Silva, Grant Likely, Rob Herring,
Rob Landley, devicetree-discuss, linux-doc, linux-kernel,
spi-devel-general
Add the chipselect array and cur_cs properties to pl022 main structure
Add a wrapper function to decide if the cs should be controlled by the
cs_control callback or the chipselect gpio
Populate chipselect property from cs-gpios
Populate master->dev.of_node, so the spi bus can find child spi
devices and register them
At pl022 setup, fill chip_data structure from dt nodes, if not provided
by platform.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
---
Applies to v3.5-rc4
Changes since v2:
* Use IS_ENABLED instead of #ifdef
* Remove bogus const change
Changes since v1:
* return EPROBE_DEFFER if gpios are not initialized yet
Thanks Thierry Reding for reviewing and improvements suggestions
.../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi_pl022.txt | 15 +++
drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi_pl022.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi_pl022.txt
index 306ec3f..b089ec7 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi_pl022.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi_pl022.txt
@@ -6,7 +6,22 @@ Required properties:
- interrupts : Should contain SPI controller interrupt
Optional properties:
+- pl022,num-chipselects : total number of chipselects
- cs-gpios : should specify GPIOs used for chipselects.
The gpios will be referred to as reg = <index> in the SPI child nodes.
If unspecified, a single SPI device without a chip select can be used.
+SPI slave nodes must be children of the SPI master node and can
+contain the following properties.
+See include/linux/amba/pl022.h for more details
+
+- pl022,hierarchy : master or slave interface
+- pl022,interface : interface type
+- pl022,slave-tx-disable : disconnect tx line in slave mode
+- pl022,com-mode : polling, interrupt or dma
+- pl022,rx-level-trig : Rx FIFO watermark level
+- pl022,tx-level-trig : Tx FIFO watermark level
+- pl022,ctrl-len : Microwire interface: Control length
+- pl022,wait-state : Microwire interface: Wait state
+- pl022,duplex : Microwire interface: Full/Half duplex
+
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c b/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
index 400ae21..fa11d0f 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
+#include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
/*
* This macro is used to define some register default values.
@@ -389,6 +391,8 @@ struct pl022 {
char *dummypage;
bool dma_running;
#endif
+ int cur_cs;
+ int chipselect[0];
};
/**
@@ -433,6 +437,14 @@ static void null_cs_control(u32 command)
pr_debug("pl022: dummy chip select control, CS=0x%x\n", command);
}
+static void pl022_cs_control(struct pl022 *pl022, u32 command)
+{
+ if (gpio_is_valid(pl022->cur_cs))
+ gpio_set_value(pl022->cur_cs, command);
+ else
+ pl022->cur_chip->cs_control(command);
+}
+
/**
* giveback - current spi_message is over, schedule next message and call
* callback of this message. Assumes that caller already
@@ -479,7 +491,7 @@ static void giveback(struct pl022 *pl022)
if (next_msg && next_msg->spi != pl022->cur_msg->spi)
next_msg = NULL;
if (!next_msg || pl022->cur_msg->state == STATE_ERROR)
- pl022->cur_chip->cs_control(SSP_CHIP_DESELECT);
+ pl022_cs_control(pl022, SSP_CHIP_DESELECT);
else
pl022->next_msg_cs_active = true;
@@ -813,8 +825,7 @@ static void dma_callback(void *data)
/* Update total bytes transferred */
msg->actual_length += pl022->cur_transfer->len;
if (pl022->cur_transfer->cs_change)
- pl022->cur_chip->
- cs_control(SSP_CHIP_DESELECT);
+ pl022_cs_control(pl022, SSP_CHIP_DESELECT);
/* Move to next transfer */
msg->state = next_transfer(pl022);
@@ -1247,8 +1258,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pl022_interrupt_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
/* Update total bytes transferred */
msg->actual_length += pl022->cur_transfer->len;
if (pl022->cur_transfer->cs_change)
- pl022->cur_chip->
- cs_control(SSP_CHIP_DESELECT);
+ pl022_cs_control(pl022, SSP_CHIP_DESELECT);
/* Move to next transfer */
msg->state = next_transfer(pl022);
tasklet_schedule(&pl022->pump_transfers);
@@ -1333,7 +1343,7 @@ static void pump_transfers(unsigned long data)
/* Reselect chip select only if cs_change was requested */
if (previous->cs_change)
- pl022->cur_chip->cs_control(SSP_CHIP_SELECT);
+ pl022_cs_control(pl022, SSP_CHIP_SELECT);
} else {
/* STATE_START */
message->state = STATE_RUNNING;
@@ -1372,7 +1382,7 @@ static void do_interrupt_dma_transfer(struct pl022 *pl022)
/* Enable target chip, if not already active */
if (!pl022->next_msg_cs_active)
- pl022->cur_chip->cs_control(SSP_CHIP_SELECT);
+ pl022_cs_control(pl022, SSP_CHIP_SELECT);
if (set_up_next_transfer(pl022, pl022->cur_transfer)) {
/* Error path */
@@ -1424,12 +1434,12 @@ static void do_polling_transfer(struct pl022 *pl022)
if (previous->delay_usecs)
udelay(previous->delay_usecs);
if (previous->cs_change)
- pl022->cur_chip->cs_control(SSP_CHIP_SELECT);
+ pl022_cs_control(pl022, SSP_CHIP_SELECT);
} else {
/* STATE_START */
message->state = STATE_RUNNING;
if (!pl022->next_msg_cs_active)
- pl022->cur_chip->cs_control(SSP_CHIP_SELECT);
+ pl022_cs_control(pl022, SSP_CHIP_SELECT);
}
/* Configuration Changing Per Transfer */
@@ -1461,7 +1471,7 @@ static void do_polling_transfer(struct pl022 *pl022)
/* Update total byte transferred */
message->actual_length += pl022->cur_transfer->len;
if (pl022->cur_transfer->cs_change)
- pl022->cur_chip->cs_control(SSP_CHIP_DESELECT);
+ pl022_cs_control(pl022, SSP_CHIP_DESELECT);
/* Move to next transfer */
message->state = next_transfer(pl022);
}
@@ -1490,6 +1500,7 @@ static int pl022_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
/* Setup the SPI using the per chip configuration */
pl022->cur_chip = spi_get_ctldata(msg->spi);
+ pl022->cur_cs = pl022->chipselect[msg->spi->chip_select];
restore_state(pl022);
flush(pl022);
@@ -1761,12 +1772,14 @@ static const struct pl022_config_chip pl022_default_chip_info = {
static int pl022_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
{
struct pl022_config_chip const *chip_info;
+ struct pl022_config_chip chip_info_dt;
struct chip_data *chip;
struct ssp_clock_params clk_freq = { .cpsdvsr = 0, .scr = 0};
int status = 0;
struct pl022 *pl022 = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
unsigned int bits = spi->bits_per_word;
u32 tmp;
+ struct device_node *np = spi->dev.of_node;
if (!spi->max_speed_hz)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1789,10 +1802,36 @@ static int pl022_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
chip_info = spi->controller_data;
if (chip_info == NULL) {
- chip_info = &pl022_default_chip_info;
- /* spi_board_info.controller_data not is supplied */
- dev_dbg(&spi->dev,
- "using default controller_data settings\n");
+ if (np) {
+ chip_info_dt = pl022_default_chip_info;
+
+ of_property_read_u32(np, "pl022,hierarchy",
+ &chip_info_dt.hierarchy);
+ of_property_read_u32(np, "pl022,interface",
+ &chip_info_dt.iface);
+ chip_info_dt.slave_tx_disable =
+ of_property_read_bool(np,
+ "pl022,slave-tx-disable");
+ of_property_read_u32(np, "pl022,com-mode",
+ &chip_info_dt.com_mode);
+ of_property_read_u32(np, "pl022,rx-level-trig",
+ &chip_info_dt.rx_lev_trig);
+ of_property_read_u32(np, "pl022,tx-level-trig",
+ &chip_info_dt.tx_lev_trig);
+ of_property_read_u32(np, "pl022,ctrl-len",
+ &chip_info_dt.ctrl_len);
+ of_property_read_u32(np, "pl022,wait-state",
+ &chip_info_dt.wait_state);
+ of_property_read_u32(np, "pl022,duplex",
+ &chip_info_dt.duplex);
+
+ chip_info = &chip_info_dt;
+ } else {
+ chip_info = &pl022_default_chip_info;
+ /* spi_board_info.controller_data not is supplied */
+ dev_dbg(&spi->dev,
+ "using default controller_data settings\n");
+ }
} else
dev_dbg(&spi->dev,
"using user supplied controller_data settings\n");
@@ -1835,8 +1874,9 @@ static int pl022_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
chip->xfer_type = chip_info->com_mode;
if (!chip_info->cs_control) {
chip->cs_control = null_cs_control;
- dev_warn(&spi->dev,
- "chip select function is NULL for this chip\n");
+ if (!gpio_is_valid(pl022->chipselect[spi->chip_select]))
+ dev_warn(&spi->dev,
+ "chip select function is NULL for this chip\n");
} else
chip->cs_control = chip_info->cs_control;
@@ -1988,7 +2028,8 @@ pl022_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
struct pl022_ssp_controller *platform_info = adev->dev.platform_data;
struct spi_master *master;
struct pl022 *pl022 = NULL; /*Data for this driver */
- int status = 0;
+ struct device_node *np = adev->dev.of_node;
+ int status = 0, i, num_cs;
dev_info(&adev->dev,
"ARM PL022 driver, device ID: 0x%08x\n", adev->periphid);
@@ -1998,8 +2039,14 @@ pl022_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
goto err_no_pdata;
}
+ num_cs = platform_info->num_chipselect;
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
+ of_property_read_u32(np, "pl022,num-chipselects", &num_cs);
+#endif
+
/* Allocate master with space for data */
- master = spi_alloc_master(dev, sizeof(struct pl022));
+ master = spi_alloc_master(dev,
+ sizeof(struct pl022) + sizeof(int) * num_cs);
if (master == NULL) {
dev_err(&adev->dev, "probe - cannot alloc SPI master\n");
status = -ENOMEM;
@@ -2017,13 +2064,40 @@ pl022_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
* on this board
*/
master->bus_num = platform_info->bus_id;
- master->num_chipselect = platform_info->num_chipselect;
+ master->num_chipselect = num_cs;
master->cleanup = pl022_cleanup;
master->setup = pl022_setup;
master->prepare_transfer_hardware = pl022_prepare_transfer_hardware;
master->transfer_one_message = pl022_transfer_one_message;
master->unprepare_transfer_hardware = pl022_unprepare_transfer_hardware;
master->rt = platform_info->rt;
+ master->dev.of_node = dev->of_node;
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
+ for (i = 0; i < num_cs; i++) {
+ int cs_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "cs-gpios", i);
+
+ if (cs_gpio == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
+ status = -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ goto err_no_gpio;
+ }
+
+ pl022->chipselect[i] = cs_gpio;
+
+ if (gpio_is_valid(cs_gpio)) {
+ if (gpio_request(cs_gpio, "ssp-pl022"))
+ dev_err(&adev->dev,
+ "could not request %d gpio\n", cs_gpio);
+ else if (gpio_direction_output(cs_gpio, 1))
+ dev_err(&adev->dev,
+ "could set gpio %d as output\n",
+ cs_gpio);
+ }
+ }
+#else
+ for (i = 0; i < num_cs; i++)
+ pl022->chipselect[i] = -EINVAL;
+#endif
/*
* Supports mode 0-3, loopback, and active low CS. Transfers are
@@ -2130,6 +2204,9 @@ pl022_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
err_no_ioremap:
amba_release_regions(adev);
err_no_ioregion:
+ #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
+ err_no_gpio:
+ #endif
spi_master_put(master);
err_no_master:
err_no_pdata:
--
1.7.10
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] spi/pl022: add devicetree support
2012-06-26 14:05 [PATCH v3] spi/pl022: add devicetree support Alexandre Pereira da Silva
@ 2012-07-01 8:39 ` Thierry Reding
2012-07-02 10:32 ` Alexandre Pereira da Silva
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2012-07-01 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Pereira da Silva
Cc: Roland Stigge, linux-doc, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel,
Rob Herring, Rob Landley, spi-devel-general
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3645 bytes --]
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:05:36AM -0300, Alexandre Pereira da Silva wrote:
> Add the chipselect array and cur_cs properties to pl022 main structure
>
> Add a wrapper function to decide if the cs should be controlled by the
> cs_control callback or the chipselect gpio
>
> Populate chipselect property from cs-gpios
>
> Populate master->dev.of_node, so the spi bus can find child spi
> devices and register them
>
> At pl022 setup, fill chip_data structure from dt nodes, if not provided
> by platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
> ---
> Applies to v3.5-rc4
>
> Changes since v2:
> * Use IS_ENABLED instead of #ifdef
> * Remove bogus const change
>
> Changes since v1:
> * return EPROBE_DEFFER if gpios are not initialized yet
>
> Thanks Thierry Reding for reviewing and improvements suggestions
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi_pl022.txt | 15 +++
> drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c b/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
[...]
> @@ -1998,8 +2039,14 @@ pl022_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
> goto err_no_pdata;
> }
>
> + num_cs = platform_info->num_chipselect;
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> + of_property_read_u32(np, "pl022,num-chipselects", &num_cs);
> +#endif
> +
Actually this has even more advantages if you use it as a condition in
an if expression:
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
of_property_read_u32(...);
The above will be compiled wether CONFIG_OF is enabled or not, but it
will not be included in the final output because of the compiler's DCE
(dead code elimination) seeing this as "if (0)". The result is that the
source code gets much better compile coverage and errors in the
conditional code can be caught earlier.
> @@ -2017,13 +2064,40 @@ pl022_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
> * on this board
> */
> master->bus_num = platform_info->bus_id;
> - master->num_chipselect = platform_info->num_chipselect;
> + master->num_chipselect = num_cs;
> master->cleanup = pl022_cleanup;
> master->setup = pl022_setup;
> master->prepare_transfer_hardware = pl022_prepare_transfer_hardware;
> master->transfer_one_message = pl022_transfer_one_message;
> master->unprepare_transfer_hardware = pl022_unprepare_transfer_hardware;
> master->rt = platform_info->rt;
> + master->dev.of_node = dev->of_node;
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> + for (i = 0; i < num_cs; i++) {
> + int cs_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "cs-gpios", i);
> +
> + if (cs_gpio == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> + status = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + goto err_no_gpio;
> + }
> +
> + pl022->chipselect[i] = cs_gpio;
> +
> + if (gpio_is_valid(cs_gpio)) {
> + if (gpio_request(cs_gpio, "ssp-pl022"))
> + dev_err(&adev->dev,
> + "could not request %d gpio\n", cs_gpio);
> + else if (gpio_direction_output(cs_gpio, 1))
> + dev_err(&adev->dev,
> + "could set gpio %d as output\n",
> + cs_gpio);
> + }
> + }
> +#else
> + for (i = 0; i < num_cs; i++)
> + pl022->chipselect[i] = -EINVAL;
> +#endif
Same here.
> /*
> * Supports mode 0-3, loopback, and active low CS. Transfers are
> @@ -2130,6 +2204,9 @@ pl022_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
> err_no_ioremap:
> amba_release_regions(adev);
> err_no_ioregion:
> + #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> + err_no_gpio:
> + #endif
And here.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] spi/pl022: add devicetree support
2012-07-01 8:39 ` Thierry Reding
@ 2012-07-02 10:32 ` Alexandre Pereira da Silva
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Pereira da Silva @ 2012-07-02 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thierry Reding
Cc: Roland Stigge, linux-doc, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel,
Rob Herring, Rob Landley, spi-devel-general
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:05:36AM -0300, Alexandre Pereira da Silva wrote:
>> Add the chipselect array and cur_cs properties to pl022 main structure
>>
>> Add a wrapper function to decide if the cs should be controlled by the
>> cs_control callback or the chipselect gpio
>>
>> Populate chipselect property from cs-gpios
>>
>> Populate master->dev.of_node, so the spi bus can find child spi
>> devices and register them
>>
>> At pl022 setup, fill chip_data structure from dt nodes, if not provided
>> by platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@gmail.com>
>> Tested-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
>> ---
>> Applies to v3.5-rc4
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> * Use IS_ENABLED instead of #ifdef
>> * Remove bogus const change
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> * return EPROBE_DEFFER if gpios are not initialized yet
>>
>> Thanks Thierry Reding for reviewing and improvements suggestions
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi_pl022.txt | 15 +++
>> drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++----
>> 2 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c b/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
> [...]
>> @@ -1998,8 +2039,14 @@ pl022_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
>> goto err_no_pdata;
>> }
>>
>> + num_cs = platform_info->num_chipselect;
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
>> + of_property_read_u32(np, "pl022,num-chipselects", &num_cs);
>> +#endif
>> +
>
> Actually this has even more advantages if you use it as a condition in
> an if expression:
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
> of_property_read_u32(...);
>
> The above will be compiled wether CONFIG_OF is enabled or not, but it
> will not be included in the final output because of the compiler's DCE
> (dead code elimination) seeing this as "if (0)". The result is that the
> source code gets much better compile coverage and errors in the
> conditional code can be caught earlier.
>
>> @@ -2017,13 +2064,40 @@ pl022_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
>> * on this board
>> */
>> master->bus_num = platform_info->bus_id;
>> - master->num_chipselect = platform_info->num_chipselect;
>> + master->num_chipselect = num_cs;
>> master->cleanup = pl022_cleanup;
>> master->setup = pl022_setup;
>> master->prepare_transfer_hardware = pl022_prepare_transfer_hardware;
>> master->transfer_one_message = pl022_transfer_one_message;
>> master->unprepare_transfer_hardware = pl022_unprepare_transfer_hardware;
>> master->rt = platform_info->rt;
>> + master->dev.of_node = dev->of_node;
>> +
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_cs; i++) {
>> + int cs_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "cs-gpios", i);
>> +
>> + if (cs_gpio == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>> + status = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> + goto err_no_gpio;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pl022->chipselect[i] = cs_gpio;
>> +
>> + if (gpio_is_valid(cs_gpio)) {
>> + if (gpio_request(cs_gpio, "ssp-pl022"))
>> + dev_err(&adev->dev,
>> + "could not request %d gpio\n", cs_gpio);
>> + else if (gpio_direction_output(cs_gpio, 1))
>> + dev_err(&adev->dev,
>> + "could set gpio %d as output\n",
>> + cs_gpio);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +#else
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_cs; i++)
>> + pl022->chipselect[i] = -EINVAL;
>> +#endif
>
> Same here.
>
>> /*
>> * Supports mode 0-3, loopback, and active low CS. Transfers are
>> @@ -2130,6 +2204,9 @@ pl022_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
>> err_no_ioremap:
>> amba_release_regions(adev);
>> err_no_ioregion:
>> + #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
>> + err_no_gpio:
>> + #endif
>
> And here.
Thanks for the hint. I will update the patch and repost later.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-02 10:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-06-26 14:05 [PATCH v3] spi/pl022: add devicetree support Alexandre Pereira da Silva
2012-07-01 8:39 ` Thierry Reding
2012-07-02 10:32 ` Alexandre Pereira da Silva
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).