From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: Add Qualcomm QUP SPI controller support Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 22:59:54 +0200 Message-ID: <1392065994.32668.1.camel@violet> References: <1391705868-20091-1-git-send-email-iivanov@mm-sol.com> <1391705868-20091-3-git-send-email-iivanov@mm-sol.com> <20140207073952.GA2610@qualcomm.com> <1391766753.27491.60.camel@iivanov-dev> <20140207173207.GA19974@qualcomm.com> <1392051302.2853.56.camel@iivanov-dev> <20140210174738.GA31596@qualcomm.com> <1392061304.24621.17.camel@violet> <20140210202926.GV1706@sonymobile.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andy Gross , Mark Brown , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , "linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Alok Chauhan , Gilad Avidov , Kiran Gunda , Sagar Dharia To: Courtney Cavin Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140210202926.GV1706@sonymobile.com> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 12:29 -0800, Courtney Cavin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:41:44PM +0100, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 11:47 -0600, Andy Gross wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:55:02PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > > > > > > [....] > > > > > > > > > > Bail here? > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know. What will be the consequences if controller continue to > > > > > > operate on its default rate? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is unclear. But if you can't set the rate that is configured or if there is > > > > > a misconfiguration, it's probably better to exit the probe and catch it here. > > > > > > > > > > > > My preference is to delay clock speed change till first > > > > SPI transfer. And use wherever transfer itself mandate. > > > > > > > > > > That works. My only concern is that it might be nice to catch a configuration > > > problem early rather than wait for the SPI transfer to fail continuously. > > > > If developer is skilled enough to know which version controller is, > > (s)he will be able to put the right frequency constrain here :-) > > A developer doesn't have to have much skill at all to copy-paste DT > configurations around and muck with numbers.... I agree with Andy here, > early validation is a good idea here, at the very least, some sanity > checks. > So, probably first variant with just warning will be good enough? Regards, Ivan > -Courtney