From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@mm-sol.com>
To: Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] spi: qup: Fix incorrect block transfers
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:28:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1412080080.26751.15.camel@iivanov-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411592698-30952-1-git-send-email-agross@codeaurora.org>
Hi Andy, just few comments.
On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 16:04 -0500, Andy Gross wrote:
<snip>
> +static void spi_qup_fifo_read(struct spi_qup *controller,
> + struct spi_transfer *xfer)
> +{
> + u32 data;
> +
> + /* clear service request */
> + writel_relaxed(QUP_OP_IN_SERVICE_FLAG,
> + controller->base + QUP_OPERATIONAL);
> +
Please, could you indent function parameters to open brace, when
they can not fit into one line.
> + while (controller->rx_bytes < xfer->len) {
> + if (!(readl_relaxed(controller->base + QUP_OPERATIONAL) &
> + QUP_OP_IN_FIFO_NOT_EMPTY))
Should be aligned just after first open brace.
> + break;
> +
> + data = readl_relaxed(controller->base + QUP_INPUT_FIFO);
> +
> + spi_qup_fill_read_buffer(controller, xfer, data);
> }
> }
>
> +static void spi_qup_block_read(struct spi_qup *controller,
> + struct spi_transfer *xfer)
> +{
> + u32 data;
> + u32 words_per_blk = controller->in_blk_sz >> 2;
I have been confused from the variable name. These are number of
32 bits reads, not SPI words, right?
> + u32 num_words = (xfer->len - controller->rx_bytes) / controller->w_size;
> + int i;
> +
> + do {
> + /* ACK by clearing service flag */
> + writel_relaxed(QUP_OP_IN_SERVICE_FLAG,
> + controller->base + QUP_OPERATIONAL);
> +
> + /* transfer up to a block size of data in a single pass */
> + for (i = 0; num_words && i < words_per_blk; i++, num_words--) {
> +
> + /* read data and fill up rx buffer */
> + data = readl_relaxed(controller->base + QUP_INPUT_FIFO);
> + spi_qup_fill_read_buffer(controller, xfer, data);
> }
>
> - writel_relaxed(word, controller->base + QUP_OUTPUT_FIFO);
> - }
> + /* check to see if next block is ready */
> + if (!(readl_relaxed(controller->base + QUP_OPERATIONAL) &
> + QUP_OP_IN_BLOCK_READ_REQ))
> + break;
> +
> + } while (num_words);
> +
> + /*
> + * Due to extra stickiness of the QUP_OP_IN_SERVICE_FLAG during block
> + * reads, it has to be cleared again at the very end
> + */
> + if (readl_relaxed(controller->base + QUP_OPERATIONAL) &
> + QUP_OP_MAX_INPUT_DONE_FLAG)
> + writel_relaxed(QUP_OP_IN_SERVICE_FLAG,
> + controller->base + QUP_OPERATIONAL);
> +
> +}
> +
>
> static irqreturn_t spi_qup_qup_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> @@ -285,9 +370,9 @@ static irqreturn_t spi_qup_qup_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>
> writel_relaxed(qup_err, controller->base + QUP_ERROR_FLAGS);
> writel_relaxed(spi_err, controller->base + SPI_ERROR_FLAGS);
> - writel_relaxed(opflags, controller->base + QUP_OPERATIONAL);
>
> if (!xfer) {
> + writel_relaxed(opflags, controller->base + QUP_OPERATIONAL);
> dev_err_ratelimited(controller->dev, "unexpected irq %08x %08x %08x\n",
> qup_err, spi_err, opflags);
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> @@ -315,11 +400,19 @@ static irqreturn_t spi_qup_qup_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> error = -EIO;
> }
>
> - if (opflags & QUP_OP_IN_SERVICE_FLAG)
> - spi_qup_fifo_read(controller, xfer);
> + if (opflags & QUP_OP_IN_SERVICE_FLAG) {
> + if (opflags & QUP_OP_IN_BLOCK_READ_REQ)
> + spi_qup_block_read(controller, xfer);
> + else
> + spi_qup_fifo_read(controller, xfer);
> + }
>
> - if (opflags & QUP_OP_OUT_SERVICE_FLAG)
> - spi_qup_fifo_write(controller, xfer);
> + if (opflags & QUP_OP_OUT_SERVICE_FLAG) {
> + if (opflags & QUP_OP_OUT_BLOCK_WRITE_REQ)
> + spi_qup_block_write(controller, xfer);
> + else
> + spi_qup_fifo_write(controller, xfer,1);
> + }
ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
#414: FILE: drivers/spi/spi-qup.c:414:
+ spi_qup_fifo_write(controller, xfer,1);
^
You don't really need this last parameter, right?
Regards,
Ivan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-30 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-24 21:04 [Patch v2] spi: qup: Fix incorrect block transfers Andy Gross
2014-09-30 12:28 ` Ivan T. Ivanov [this message]
2014-09-30 19:55 ` Andy Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1412080080.26751.15.camel@iivanov-dev \
--to=iivanov@mm-sol.com \
--cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).