From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: qup: Request CS GPIO's during probe Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 10:20:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1425889207.2440.9.camel@mm-sol.com> References: <1425655578-22400-1-git-send-email-iivanov@mm-sol.com> <1425655578-22400-2-git-send-email-iivanov@mm-sol.com> <54F9F31A.3050501@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Mark Brown , linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Boyd Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54F9F31A.3050501-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Hi Stephen, > On Mar 6, 2015, at 8:34 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote= : > On 03/06/15 07:26, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > > Ensure that driver is owner of the GPIO's used for CS signals. > Why? What happens if we don=E2=80=99t? We can have wrong DT configuration, which could reconfigure GPIO=E2=80=99s without any warning or error. > > Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov > > --- > > drivers/spi/spi-qup.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >=20 > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c b/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c > > index 2b2c359..a07ba46 100644 > > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c > > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-qup.c > > @@ -14,11 +14,13 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > @@ -499,7 +501,7 @@ static int spi_qup_probe(struct platform_device= *pdev) > > struct device *dev; > > void __iomem *base; > > u32 max_freq, iomode, num_cs; > > - int ret, irq, size; > > + int ret, irq, size, cs, cs_gpio; > >=20 > > dev =3D &pdev->dev; > > res =3D platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > > @@ -556,6 +558,19 @@ static int spi_qup_probe(struct platform_devic= e *pdev) > > else > > master->num_chipselect =3D num_cs; > >=20 > > + for (cs =3D 0; cs < master->num_chipselect; cs++) { > > + cs_gpio =3D of_get_named_gpio(dev->of_node, "cs-gpi= os", cs); > > + > > + if (!gpio_is_valid(cs_gpio)) > > + continue; > > + > > + ret =3D devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, cs_gpio, "spi= -qup-cs"); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't get cs gpios\n")= ; > > + goto error; > > + } > > + } > > + > > master->bus_num =3D pdev->id; > Is this related to [1]? In that case I was just relying on DT/pinctrl= to > properly request the gpios. But the DT/pinctrl did not request GPIO=E2=80=99s, it just configure th= em. =46or some reason we are ending without any pinctrl_map of type=20 PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, which is used for pin reservation.=20 > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/27/784 I have missed this one. I have considered same approach, but abandoned it, because of issues related to double request reasons mentioned by Ma= rk. Regards, Ivan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html