From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: Applied "spi: dw: explicitly free IRQ handler in dw_spi_remove_host()" to the spi tree Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:25:33 +0300 Message-ID: <1445617533.22669.64.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1445586058.22669.55.camel@linux.intel.com> <20151023161810.GH29919@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mark Brown Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151023161810.GH29919-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 01:18 +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:40:58AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 08:11 +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > > > The patch >=20 > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0spi: dw: explicitly free IRQ handler in dw_spi_= remove_host() >=20 > > This one seems incomplete. >=20 > > Yes, we already have a fix=C2=A002f20387e1bc in your tree. >=20 > This *appears* to be the same commit you are following up on (please > always include human readable descriptions) This commit (9f89566) is a redundancy made by mistake. >=20 > > This makes free_irq() call duplicate. Currently in your for-next branch void dw_spi_remove_host(struct dw_spi *dws) { =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0dw_spi_debugfs_remove(d= ws); =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0free_irq(dws->irq, dws-= >master); ^^^ (1) =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0if (dws->dma_ops && dws= ->dma_ops->dma_exit) =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0dws->dma_ops->dma_exit(dws); =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0spi_shutdown_chip(dws); =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0free_irq(dws->irq, dws-= >master); ^^^ (2) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dw_spi_remove_host); > > Please, remove it from your tree > > or do the revert. >=20 > Are you saying that you have realised that your patch is broken since > sending it?=C2=A0=C2=A0I've dropped this commit... No, the commit=C2=A002f20387e1bc is rightful and should be present in t= he tree. P.S. Commit IDs as they appear in your for-next branch of SPI tree. --=20 Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html