From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: [PATCH] spi: spidev: Hold spi_lock over all defererences of spi in release() Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 16:06:39 +0000 Message-ID: <1447689999-20632-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Vegard Nossum , Mark Brown To: linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Return-path: Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: We use the spi_lock spinlock to protect against races between the device being removed and file operations on the spidev. This means that in the removal path all references to the device need to be done under lock as in removal we dropping references to the device. Reported-by: Vegard Nossum Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/spi/spidev.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spidev.c b/drivers/spi/spidev.c index 91a0fcd72423..d0e7dfc647cf 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spidev.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spidev.c @@ -651,11 +651,11 @@ static int spidev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) kfree(spidev->rx_buffer); spidev->rx_buffer = NULL; + spin_lock_irq(&spidev->spi_lock); if (spidev->spi) spidev->speed_hz = spidev->spi->max_speed_hz; /* ... after we unbound from the underlying device? */ - spin_lock_irq(&spidev->spi_lock); dofree = (spidev->spi == NULL); spin_unlock_irq(&spidev->spi_lock); -- 2.6.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html