From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lei liu Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] spi: mediatek: revise mtk_spi_probe() failure flow Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:17:53 +0800 Message-ID: <1448443073.27169.7.camel@mhfsdcap03> References: <1447986080-31410-1-git-send-email-leilk.liu@mediatek.com> <1447986080-31410-4-git-send-email-leilk.liu@mediatek.com> <20151121133949.GH26072@sirena.org.uk> <1448332404.27169.4.camel@mhfsdcap03> <20151124130426.GL1929@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark Rutland , , "Sascha Hauer" , , , , "Matthias Brugger" , To: Mark Brown Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151124130426.GL1929-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 13:04 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:33:24AM +0800, lei liu wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 13:39 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:21:19AM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote: > > > > > This patch revises failure flow while pm_runtime_enable(). > > > > Why? This also doesn't apply against current code, please check and > > > resend. > > > I don't know. I can git am this patch to spi/for-next. I will resend it, > > please help to apply it again, thanks. > > If you don't know why we should make this change then we may as well > just not make it? OK. I will write a proper commit message to explain what this patch does. Thanks. > _________________ > ______________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html