From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudip Mukherjee Subject: [PATCH v2 7/8] spi: lm70llp: use dev_warn Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:17:34 +0530 Message-ID: <1449485255-1103-7-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> References: <1449485255-1103-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Sudip Mukherjee To: Mark Brown Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1449485255-1103-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org As we have a struct device available it is better to use dev_warn() instead of printk. Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee --- drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c b/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c index 9d45a63..393eb2b 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c @@ -249,9 +249,8 @@ static void spi_lm70llp_attach(struct parport *p) */ status = spi_bitbang_start(&pp->bitbang); if (status < 0) { - printk(KERN_WARNING - "%s: spi_bitbang_start failed with status %d\n", - DRVNAME, status); + dev_warn(&pd->dev, "spi_bitbang_start failed with status %d\n", + status); goto out_off_and_release; } @@ -278,7 +277,7 @@ static void spi_lm70llp_attach(struct parport *p) dev_dbg(&pp->spidev_lm70->dev, "spidev_lm70 at %s\n", dev_name(&pp->spidev_lm70->dev)); else { - printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: spi_new_device failed\n", DRVNAME); + dev_warn(&pd->dev, "spi_new_device failed\n"); status = -ENODEV; goto out_bitbang_stop; } -- 1.9.1