From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF80AC47087 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 08:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF374613DA for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 08:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235256AbhE1IYk (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2021 04:24:40 -0400 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:26658 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234905AbhE1IYj (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2021 04:24:39 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046660.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14S8MGrN010780; Fri, 28 May 2021 10:22:53 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foss.st.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=selector1; bh=SC8NOG3k/WMH3/oxYElq4I18/iOVJMr+y1hZSlPxh+M=; b=uyWVP4X7Gi+YyCvJ2gJlz6DLBAjgmUWTiPX735isWGACciSdQi3nywuNMYtn9eA+H7GF KLmap4uD03uYJNbpF7X59L7G07eRBbNLzt46jQPujg6Yhj7ocHFP12ReO3/mInsrsTo6 IpMShFWtHUBSltkqmxanq05CQAArQ3x9A3MWzvh3Vw0et3ZjRiob4jhMv/59mwhMw116 ugl/cxnpr1Bb+OQb4KZnTc2hUfDektzDT8cJ3VIRhsUE8ao8CQyx7OQ2chBCXKP75Jgv yqDGnRlcoG9bo0nzwIhy4RTrLvJoS0rWJXF8GU/uskwsJhZa2K4S4X9qjWDTKpUtbIn8 1g== Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 38t7k3eps8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 28 May 2021 10:22:53 +0200 Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id D3E8810002A; Fri, 28 May 2021 10:22:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (sfhdag2node3.st.com [10.75.127.6]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id B68E621CA64; Fri, 28 May 2021 10:22:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lmecxl0573.lme.st.com (10.75.127.45) by SFHDAG2NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 28 May 2021 10:22:51 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mtd: spinand: add SPI-NAND MTD resume handler To: Miquel Raynal CC: Mark Brown , Vignesh Raghavendra , Boris Brezillon , , Alexandre Torgue , , , , , , Pratyush Yadav References: <20210527161252.16620-1-patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> <20210527161252.16620-4-patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> <20210527182317.38d5edc6@xps13> From: Patrice CHOTARD Message-ID: <1ed72554-311d-5f6f-a108-e29138166dc0@foss.st.com> Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 10:22:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210527182317.38d5edc6@xps13> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.45] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG3NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.9) To SFHDAG2NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.6) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391,18.0.761 definitions=2021-05-28_04:2021-05-27,2021-05-28 signatures=0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Hi Miquel On 5/27/21 6:23 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi Patrice, > > + Pratyush > > wrote on Thu, 27 May 2021 18:12:52 +0200: > >> From: Patrice Chotard >> >> After power up, all SPI NAND's blocks are locked. Only read operations >> are allowed, write and erase operations are forbidden. >> The SPI NAND framework unlocks all the blocks during its initialization. >> >> During a standby low power, the memory is powered down, losing its >> configuration. >> During the resume, the QSPI driver state is restored but the SPI NAND >> framework does not reconfigured the memory. >> >> This patch adds SPI-NAND MTD PM handlers for resume ops. >> SPI NAND resume op re-initializes SPI NAND flash to its probed state. >> >> Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello >> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard >> --- >> Changes in v3: >> - Add spinand_read_cfg() call to repopulate cache >> >> Changes in v2: >> - Add helper spinand_block_unlock(). >> - Add spinand_ecc_enable() call. >> - Remove some dev_err(). >> - Fix commit's title and message. >> >> drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c >> index 1f699ad84f1b..e3fcbcf381c3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c >> @@ -1099,6 +1099,38 @@ static int spinand_block_unlock(struct spinand_device *spinand) >> return ret; >> } >> >> +static void spinand_mtd_resume(struct mtd_info *mtd) >> +{ >> + struct spinand_device *spinand = mtd_to_spinand(mtd); >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = spinand_reset_op(spinand); >> + if (ret) >> + return; >> + >> + ret = spinand_read_cfg(spinand); >> + if (ret) >> + return; >> + >> + ret = spinand_init_quad_enable(spinand); >> + if (ret) >> + return; >> + >> + ret = spinand_upd_cfg(spinand, CFG_OTP_ENABLE, 0); >> + if (ret) >> + return; >> + >> + ret = spinand_manufacturer_init(spinand); >> + if (ret) >> + return; >> + >> + ret = spinand_block_unlock(spinand); >> + if (ret) >> + return; >> + >> + spinand_ecc_enable(spinand, false); >> +} > > Sorry for not being clear, but I think what Pratyush meant was that > you could create a helper doing all the common initializations between > spinand_init() and spinand_resume() and call it from these places to > avoid code duplication. His comment somehow outclassed mine as I only > focused on the unlock part (which I think is clearer anyway, please keep > it like that). > My bad too, i read too quickly Pratyush's asnwer. I am preparing a v4. Thanks Patrice >> + >> static int spinand_init(struct spinand_device *spinand) >> { >> struct device *dev = &spinand->spimem->spi->dev; >> @@ -1186,6 +1218,7 @@ static int spinand_init(struct spinand_device *spinand) >> mtd->_block_isreserved = spinand_mtd_block_isreserved; >> mtd->_erase = spinand_mtd_erase; >> mtd->_max_bad_blocks = nanddev_mtd_max_bad_blocks; >> + mtd->_resume = spinand_mtd_resume; >> >> if (nand->ecc.engine) { >> ret = mtd_ooblayout_count_freebytes(mtd); > > Thanks, > Miquèl >