From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] spi/mpc8xxx: don't check platform_get_irq's return value against zero
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:05:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091217130549.GA9032@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091216193745.GA20429@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Hi Anton,
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:37:45PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 08:18:39PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> [...]
> > > > I'm a bit annoyed as this is the third time[1] this month this irq0
> > > > discussion pops up for me. I think people see that irq0 is involved
> > > > somehow, start wailing and stop seeing the issues being fixed.
> > >
> > > For this particular driver, there is NO issue whatsoever. It is
> > > only used for PowerPC, which has VIRQ0 == invalid IRQ. And note
> > > that there still could be HWIRQ0 on PowerPC, but it is *never*
> > > mapped to VIRQ0.
> > Yes, there is an issue. If the platform device doesn't have a resource
> > specifing the irq, platform_get_irq returns -ENXIO. So in the driver
> > (unsigned)(-ENXIO) is passed to mpc8xxx_spi_probe as (!(-ENXIO)) is
> > false and so the error isn't catched.
>
> If you look into how we create the platform device, you'll notice
> that -ENXIO isn't possible.
> It's in arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc832x_rdb.c:of_fsl_spi_probe(),
> which is a legacy interface that I'd like to be removed anyway.
>
> Though, if you want to fix the inconsistency in the platform device
> API, then I'd suggest to fix the platform_get_irq(). The driver itself
> is correct.
With platform_get_irq as it is today, the check in
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
if (!irq)
return -EINVAL;
is non-sense as !irq always evaluates to 0. If your argue that the
resources are right, then the logical consequence is to strip down
plat_mpc8xxx_spi_probe to just
struct spi_master *master;
master = mpc8xxx_spi_probe(&pdev->dev,
platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0)
platform_get_irq(pdev, 0));
if (IS_ERR(master))
return PTR_ERR(master);
return 0;
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-17 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1260979809-24811-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
[not found] ` <1260979809-24811-2-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
[not found] ` <1260979809-24811-3-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
[not found] ` <1260979809-24811-4-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
[not found] ` <1260979809-24811-5-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
2009-12-16 16:10 ` [PATCH 6/7] spi/mpc8xxx: don't check platform_get_irq's return value against zero Uwe Kleine-König
2009-12-16 16:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-12-16 17:49 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-12-16 18:20 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-12-16 19:18 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-12-16 19:37 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-12-16 19:51 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-12-17 13:05 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2009-12-17 16:25 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-12-16 18:20 ` David Vrabel
2009-12-17 16:39 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-12-19 15:13 ` [PATCH] " Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-13 11:05 ` [RESEND PATCH 5/5] " Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-13 11:17 ` Anton Vorontsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091217130549.GA9032@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@csr.com \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).