From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
Andres Salomon <dilinger-pFFUokh25LWsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Mark Brown
<broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>,
khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet-OfajU3CKLf1/SzgSGea1oA@public.gmane.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
David Brownell
<dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
Mocean Laboratories
<info-l7gf1WXxx3uGw+nKnLezzg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/19] timberdale: mfd_cell is now implicitly available to drivers
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:03:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110407150322.GB3923@sortiz-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110407143515.GC26452-MrY2KI0G/OVr83L8+7iqerDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 07:35:15AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Below is a patch for the Xilinx SPI example. Although this would fix the
> > issue, we'd still have to do that on device per device basis. I had a similar
> > solution where MFD drivers would set a flag for sub drivers that don't need
> > any of the MFD bits. In that case the MFD core code would just forward the
> > platform data, instead of embedding it through an MFD cell.
>
> platform_data is already a fiddly bit where you don't know what
> structure type platform_data points at; it is implicitly known and
> easy to get wrong. This solution makes me *very* nervous
> because it would become even easier to get a mismatch on the
> platform_data pointer type.
How would that be more error prone than say a board file instantiating a
platform device after having set the platform_data pointer to point to an
implicitely know structure reference ?
Cheers,
Samuel.
P.S.: Would you be ok with something like the patch below ?
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/timberdale.c | 8 ++++----
> > drivers/spi/xilinx_spi.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/linux/mfd/core.h | 3 +++
> > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/timberdale.c b/drivers/mfd/timberdale.c
> > index 94c6c8a..c9220ce 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/timberdale.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/timberdale.c
> > @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ static __devinitdata struct mfd_cell timberdale_cells_bar0_cfg0[] = {
> > .mfd_data = &timberdale_radio_platform_data,
> > },
> > {
> > - .name = "xilinx_spi",
> > + .name = "mfd_xilinx_spi",
> > .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(timberdale_spi_resources),
> > .resources = timberdale_spi_resources,
> > .mfd_data = &timberdale_xspi_platform_data,
> > @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static __devinitdata struct mfd_cell timberdale_cells_bar0_cfg1[] = {
> > .mfd_data = &timberdale_radio_platform_data,
> > },
> > {
> > - .name = "xilinx_spi",
> > + .name = "mfd_xilinx_spi",
> > .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(timberdale_spi_resources),
> > .resources = timberdale_spi_resources,
> > .mfd_data = &timberdale_xspi_platform_data,
> > @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static __devinitdata struct mfd_cell timberdale_cells_bar0_cfg2[] = {
> > .mfd_data = &timberdale_radio_platform_data,
> > },
> > {
> > - .name = "xilinx_spi",
> > + .name = "mfd_xilinx_spi",
> > .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(timberdale_spi_resources),
> > .resources = timberdale_spi_resources,
> > .mfd_data = &timberdale_xspi_platform_data,
> > @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ static __devinitdata struct mfd_cell timberdale_cells_bar0_cfg3[] = {
> > .mfd_data = &timberdale_radio_platform_data,
> > },
> > {
> > - .name = "xilinx_spi",
> > + .name = "mfd_xilinx_spi",
> > .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(timberdale_spi_resources),
> > .resources = timberdale_spi_resources,
> > .mfd_data = &timberdale_xspi_platform_data,
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/xilinx_spi.c b/drivers/spi/xilinx_spi.c
> > index c69c6f2..3287b84 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/xilinx_spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/xilinx_spi.c
> > @@ -471,7 +471,11 @@ static int __devinit xilinx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> > struct spi_master *master;
> > u8 i;
> >
> > - pdata = mfd_get_data(dev);
> > + if (platform_get_device_id(dev) &&
> > + platform_get_device_id(dev)->driver_data & MFD_PLATFORM_DEVICE)
> > + pdata = mfd_get_data(dev);
> > + else
> > + pdata = dev->dev.platform_data;
> > if (pdata) {
> > num_cs = pdata->num_chipselect;
> > little_endian = pdata->little_endian;
> > @@ -530,6 +534,18 @@ static int __devexit xilinx_spi_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
> > /* work with hotplug and coldplug */
> > MODULE_ALIAS("platform:" XILINX_SPI_NAME);
> >
> > +static const struct platform_device_id xilinx_spi_id_table[] = {
> > + {
> > + .name = XILINX_SPI_NAME,
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .name = "mfd_xilinx_spi",
> > + .driver_data = MFD_PLATFORM_DEVICE,
> > + },
> > + { }, /* Terminating Entry */
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, xilinx_spi_id_table);
> > +
> > static struct platform_driver xilinx_spi_driver = {
> > .probe = xilinx_spi_probe,
> > .remove = __devexit_p(xilinx_spi_remove),
> > @@ -538,6 +554,7 @@ static struct platform_driver xilinx_spi_driver = {
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > .of_match_table = xilinx_spi_of_match,
> > },
> > + .id_table = xilinx_spi_id_table,
> > };
> >
> > static int __init xilinx_spi_pltfm_init(void)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/core.h b/include/linux/mfd/core.h
> > index ad1b19a..13f31f4 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/core.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/core.h
> > @@ -89,6 +89,9 @@ static inline const struct mfd_cell *mfd_get_cell(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return pdev->dev.platform_data;
> > }
> >
> > +/* */
> > +#define MFD_PLATFORM_DEVICE BIT(0)
> > +
> > /*
> > * Given a platform device that's been created by mfd_add_devices(), fetch
> > * the .mfd_data entry from the mfd_cell that created it.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> > http://oss.intel.com/
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-07 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110202195417.228e2656@queued.net>
[not found] ` <20110202195417.228e2656-pFFUokh25LWsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-03 4:08 ` [PATCH 07/19] timberdale: mfd_cell is now implicitly available to drivers Andres Salomon
2011-03-31 23:05 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <20110331230522.GI437-e0URQFbLeQY2iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-01 11:20 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-01 17:47 ` Andres Salomon
2011-04-01 17:56 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-01 18:00 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=bCd_+f=EG-O=U5VH_ZNjFhxkziQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-01 23:52 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-01 23:58 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=bq=OGzXFp7qiBr7x_BnGOWf=DRQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-02 0:10 ` Andres Salomon
2011-04-04 10:03 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-05 3:04 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-06 15:23 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-06 15:58 ` Greg KH
2011-04-06 17:05 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-06 17:16 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-04-06 17:51 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-06 18:07 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-04-06 17:56 ` Greg KH
2011-04-06 18:25 ` Andres Salomon
2011-04-06 18:38 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <20110406183854.GA10058-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-07 8:04 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-06 18:47 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-06 18:59 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20110406185902.GN25654-UiBtZHVXSwEVvW8u9ZQWYwjfymiNCTlR@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-06 22:09 ` Greg KH
2011-04-07 8:09 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-04-07 13:40 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-04-07 14:35 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <20110407143515.GC26452-MrY2KI0G/OVr83L8+7iqerDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-07 15:03 ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]
2011-04-07 18:06 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-07 16:24 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-01 18:26 ` Samuel Ortiz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110407150322.GB3923@sortiz-mobl \
--to=sameo-vuqaysv1563yd54fqh9/ca@public.gmane.org \
--cc=balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dilinger-pFFUokh25LWsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gregkh-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=info-l7gf1WXxx3uGw+nKnLezzg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jacmet-OfajU3CKLf1/SzgSGea1oA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).