From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dmaengine: add ep93xx DMA support Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 21:38:01 +0300 Message-ID: <20110526183800.GE2957@acer> References: <20110525195413.GC2996@acer> <20110526043344.GA2749@acer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Vinod Koul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hsweeten@visionengravers.com, ryan@bluewatersys.com, Dan Williams , Grant Likely , spi mailing list To: Linus Walleij Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:15:25AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > Do you think that we can go forward with this patch series if I drop the last > > patch (spi/ep93xx: add DMA support)? This way we will have dmaengine > > implementation in place, whatever SPI driver we choose to use with ep93xx. > > Yes and you don't have to drop any DMA support for the existing driver > for me alone, now that it's in the tree it should be maintained. I only > wanted to raise the issue of code duplication, not block any patches. Ok, so I'll keep the last patch for now. BTW: if we get amba-pl022 driver to work with ep93xx, do you have any ideas how to proceed from there? I mean, should we convert existing users to use that driver instead and finally remove the ep93xx_spi driver?