From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: reorganize drivers Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:15:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20110606151504.GA7448@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110605071725.26517.11573.stgit@ponder> <201106061100.38249.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Rusty Russell , Michael Buesch , Arnd Bergmann , linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli , James Bottomley , Alexandre Bounine , Stefan Richter , Geert Uytterhoeven , "Ben Dooks \(embedded platforms\)" , "Jean Delvare \(PC drivers, core\)" , spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, Matt Porter , "David S. Miller" To: Grant Likely Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pcmcia-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-pcmcia-bounces+glkpd-linux-pcmcia=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:39:04AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > However, there are a number of bus types that have infrastructure, but > no actual drivers associated with them, like mca, amba and clk. It > might make sense to move those bus types into drivers/base alongside > the platform_bus_type implementation. More or less agreed - I'm not sure we should think about clk just yet because we don't know what that'll end up looking like yet...